Hi,
This is in response to the article Helen linked to, titled Burying the Hatchet. I enjoyed reading about the author’s experience as a book critic, and his transparency about why being critical (in a non-constructive kind of way) was more meaningful to him at that time in his career, rather than saying something ‘nice.’
My impression and what popped up in my mind while I was reading the’history of the critic was stuffy ascots and tightly tweeded circles of people. I felt like a fly on the wall (or should I give myself a higher-brow placement?), listening in on the intellectuals, talking about why something was so terrible, and automatically nodding in agreement with the person who was deemed as the ‘authority.’ Reminded me of cliques and bullies.
He seems to think that the internet brought an end to the bullycritic because of the vastness of exposure a critic has on the interwebs, and one person’s authoritative ascot is another person’s dunce cap. Lee also talks about how we are living in a ‘critical age… where technology and innovation is killing the art of critical standards because artistic creation is moving at a faster pace.’ Meaning that one’s critique won’t last because the measuring stick will have evolved, first.
Very interesting theory, but I don’t quite buy into the idea that negative criticism no longer exists. I say this because when I read an article or an op-ed piece, I ignore the comments section below because people really like to sling their insults at either the author, the topic, or both, and I don’t like to be reminded on how much people enjoy reading their own selfie-comments.
Instead, I think he’s had a change of heart after his own book was reviewed. Growing up and putting the sand down instead of throwing it can hurt at first, but well worth the effort. No one likes getting sand in their eyes.
Jamie — As I read the final sentences of that article, I’m getting this sense that the author might just be trading in his butcher knife for a jeweled dagger tucked away in the perfumed recesses of his well-polished boots. There’s still that same intent of carnage but accomplished in such a way that the victim’s throat would have been slit and his jugulars bled dry before he was even fully aware of what’s happening.
I seem to sense him mentally smirking as he writes these lines: “Nowadays, the abstractions of aesthetic and intellectual criteria matter much less to me than people’s efforts to console themselves, to free themselves, to escape from themselves, by sitting down and making something…..mortality seems a greater enemy than mediocrity….writing even an inferior book might well be a superior way of living.”
I too was struck (no pun intended) by his reference to the way he framed our age as being “critical” rather than “organic.” What he said about the critic’s job nowadays of defining standards to “offer clarity and illumination amid all the change” instead of just trying “to survive and flourish amid ever-shifting modes of cognition and transmission” might well apply to us in the professional communications field. That’s quite daunting. Going back to my metaphors about knives and daggers, the big leaps in media technology have really become a double-edged sword for many in the profession.
Hey Jamie,
I am also not buying into the idea that negative criticism is going away. Similar to many other media forms, it seems to be changing. The internet has changed the world so immensely and so rapidly that anyone with an internet connection can now be a critic in some form. As anyone who has ever read YouTube comments knows, there is definitely thriving negativity there, but there are also ways for consumers to rate services themselves. If you were on Amazon, would you rather buy the product ranked 4.5 out of 5 stars by over 2,000 people, or the product ranked 5 out of 5 by one esteemed critic? Perhaps since there are so many rating systems and new ways to critique products, services, and literary works, the jobs of being the few distinguished critics are slowly ebbing away.
However, Siegel does seem to also agree that the mode is changing: “It’s the critic’s job nowadays not just to try to survive and flourish amid ever-shifting modes of cognition and transmission, but to define new standards that might offer clarity and illumination amid all the change. Quite simply, the book review is dead, and the long review essay centered on a specific book or books is staggering toward extinction. The future lies in a synthetic approach. Instead of books, art, theatre, and music being consigned to specialized niches, we might have a criticism that better reflects the eclecticism of our time, a criticism that takes in various arts all at once.”
Rotten Tomatoes is a great example of critic meets non-critic. I’m sure many of you are already familiar with the movie ranking site, but while it lists critic reviews and ratings for each movie, it also lists the average rating user participants gave the film, side by side. Perhaps the future of literary and artistic criticism is a compromise.
I do think that negative criticism still exists too, but there is also the backlash against the negative criticism that gets heard as well. I am thinking specifically of the critic from the new york times that talked about Melissa McCarthy and her body. She ended up responding to his comments and the Huffington Post wrote an article about it. The critic was called out for his hateful comments. This has become more and more common. I feel like it happens a lot on sites like Jezebel. One writer on that site (Lindy West) responded to a number of hateful comments following her appearance on a show that was talking about women in comedy. She just reads the comments which are mindblowing, yet sadly so typical of comment sections. I never read the comments either because they always make me depressed. So, these comments might have just been lost in the feed and never addressed. Thankfully there is an attempt to engage the negative criticism and get something out of it, some kind of awareness to reignite fires/conversations about issues that we felt were decided long ago, though obviously only in certain circles. Quite possibly in the past the negative criticism would have just been accepted like Siegel mentions happened in the past with book reviews.
I see some hope for the future with respect to internet conversations, but when will we be able to truly bury the hatchet when inflammatory comments have a way of generating views? In just the past week a number of sites have talked about disabling the comment section or limiting what people can say. I have never really believed that we were being invited to “join a conversation” when it comes to internet commenting because it it usually a shouting match.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/13/melissa-mccarthy-rex-reed-response_n_3435596.html
http://jezebel.com/if-comedy-has-no-lady-problem-why-am-i-getting-so-many-511214385
Siegel’s not saying that negative criticism is disappearing- As Jarratt mentions, there’s been a radical leveling of the playing field where anyone can be a critic, which makes it easier for popular outcry to build when folks think someone’s being mean. Frankly, I’m not sure why that matters, since a supported argument should be able to withstand pop outrage.
Here’s the key I think Siegel missed: acerbic criticism isn’t going anywhere, because it’s been appropriated by popular audiences. Everyone has a voice on the internet, which is why Jarratt and others have noted the Comments section is frequently an unqualified shouting match (remember that tennis ad for The Ladders? vimeo.com/11212514). Similarly, anyone can self-(re)publish, which magnifies the impact of voices that would have never even reached the editing room floor decades ago.
What’s the effect of all this power to the people? Intellectual criticism is being replaced by pop outrage- the self-righteous indignation of the masses, pitchforks and all. The radically democratizing power of the internet has given everyone a voice, which has encouraged the impression that anyone and everyone’s opinion is equally valid and meritorious. Professional critics (or anyone else, really) can easily be perceived as elites, and are met with the leveling outrage of popular indignation. It’s simply more popular to be perceived as “the good guy” defending someone else- Consider the following:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tamara-shayne-kagel/defense-of-miley-cyrus-vmas_b_3824923.html
The narrative of popular criticism has shifted, from a perceived elite voice to counter-criticism of the same, and I’m not sure we’re any better for it.
Almost forgot to mention:
http://www.newmuseum.org/exhibitions/view/fifteen-stars-by-brian-droitcour
Elevating online reviews back into museum space- Where do we go from here?
(bit.ly/UPhzAQ)
Thanks, everyone! I love all your comments.
Regular visits listed here are the easiest method to appreciate your energy, which is why why I am going to the website everyday, searching for new, interesting info. Many, thank you 스포츠중계
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog, I will keep visiting this blog very often 베팅의민족
비슷한 주제에 대한 흥미로운 정보를 읽을 수있는 페이지로 여러분을 초대합니다. 꽁머니
훌륭한 작업을 완료했습니다. t 내 친구 ind personilly wtll certitnly dtgtt를 제안합니다. t’m conftdent 그들은 thts webstte에서 gitned 될 것입니다 올인구조대
이 멋진 정보를 얻게되어 정말 감사합니다 파워볼
This post is greatly simple to scrutinize and recognize without overlooking any unobtrusive components. Remarkable work! 온라인카지노
당신이 작성하는 것을 멋지게, 정보는 매우 좋고 흥미 롭습니다. 나는 당신에게 내 사이트에 대한 링크를 줄 것입니다. 바카라사이트
다소 환상적이지만이 치료법의 조언을 확인하십시오. 스포츠중계
Pretty good post. I have just stumbled upon your blog and enjoyed reading your blog posts very much. I am looking for new posts to get more precious info. Big thanks for the useful info. sajitoto
다소 환상적이지만이 치료법의 조언을 확인하십시오. 스포츠중계
Truly, this article is really one of the very best in the history of articles. I am a antique ’Article’ collector and I sometimes read some new articles if I find them interesting. And I found this one pretty fascinating and it should go into my collection. Very good work! sajitoto
Interesting topic for a blog. I have been searching the Internet for fun and came upon your website. Fabulous post. Thanks a ton for sharing your knowledge! It is great to see that some people still put in an effort into managing their websites. I’ll be sure to check back again real soon. transformer custom
This is an extraordinary element for sharing this useful message. I am dazzled by the information you have on this blog. It causes me from multiple points of view. A debt of gratitude is in order for posting this once more. transformer custom
Admiring the time and effort you put into your blog and detailed information you offer!.. 꽁머니
I have read your excellent post. This is a great job. I have enjoyed reading your post first time. I want to say thanks for this post. Thank you.. 카지노사이트