Good drawing. It is a bit pixelated. The second degree is about differentiation in number of structure of each type – although could also be the different in size. Your second degree is compouded; it is both different in number and organization. Let the third degree be the organization instead. I think there is potential here to explore the arragement in multiple different scenarios. The different programs don’t always have to be arranged in the same order, what if the logic is inversed or separated into group or combined into larger size? Use the different rule to explore the different potential. Also there is transparency introduced but little exploration on the definition of the overlap.
Good drawing. It is a bit pixelated. The second degree is about differentiation in number of structure of each type – although could also be the different in size. Your second degree is compouded; it is both different in number and organization. Let the third degree be the organization instead. I think there is potential here to explore the arragement in multiple different scenarios. The different programs don’t always have to be arranged in the same order, what if the logic is inversed or separated into group or combined into larger size? Use the different rule to explore the different potential. Also there is transparency introduced but little exploration on the definition of the overlap.