Bliss_Lyndan_222_Ex1.1

Bliss_Lyndan_222_Ex1.1

From Object to Field 

From this section I gathered that object to field is describing the way that objects move from individuals to collectives. Field conditions in architecture are a little different than typical field conditions because they fit the more exact meaning. A field condition could be anything that unifies many different elements, all while still holding to the identities of each. My understanding of a field conditions are determined by intricate connections through things like repetition, the forms between them, and intervals.

 

 

 

Geometric vs. Algebraic Combinations 

Classical architecture shows strong elements proportion through geometry and ratios. It is a great example of how the proportions of certain elements work harmoniously with the relationships of all the elements. Use of axis, symmetry, and formality are all strong rules that are seen in classical architecture, although these rules are so broad and varied, yet they still work so well to create a strong whole.

 

 

Thick 2D

The field has a strong potential to show and redefine the figure/ground relationship. The way that ones views an object when it is read on a field, it can be interpreted in many ways and provoke different thoughts and feelings. Most of the time the field is thought of to just be a surface and viewed in plan, yet the moire brings about the question of is it really just a surface? A moire is a figurative effect produced by the superstition of two fields.

 

 

 

 

Flocks, Schools, Swarms, Crowds

The flocking behavior of birds is a great example of how a field phenomenon because of the precise and simple local conditions. It does not matter the size of the flock, they still display a similar structure. Flocks movements are never exactly the same, yet there is strong repetition in the way that the move, because of localized behavior patterns. Crowds move in a similar fashion, just with less predictable movements and patterns. The way that swarms and crowds move is a great way to think about architecture and shows endless possibilities when you explore with a more fluid approach.

 

 

Distributed Institutions 

There is strong historical connections in many classical institutions that we see, through the rules of axis, hierarchy, and symmetry. With the new modern era coming about, architects and artists wanted to see a shift in these institutions and to see them more lightweight. It is difficult to stray from those main classical rules though, because the arrangements and the connections between all of these elements will always remain. The best way to go about doing this would be to suggest a new way to connect each part, rather than trying to think of a completely new par in general.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email