Exercise 1.1a

Exercise 1.1a

  1. Geometric vs. Algebraic Combination

Classical architecture is formed as a whole through the combination of geometric systems. The ratio of elements in these systems and relationship between elements is what creates a larger whole. In The Great Mosque of Cordoba, individual parts contribute to the overall success of the mosque. For example, the forecourt, minaret tower, covered area for worship, columns, and arches only make sense once combined into a field. These geometric shapes, made up of lines, planes, and solids, create relationships between each other within the field. Using what we know combining numerical units to create understanding in algebraic combination, the same must be true for geometric combination.

2. Walking out of Cubism

Barnett Newman left the cubist era and began using more simple sequences such as: plane-line-plane. More complicated combinations of planes coming from European artists no longer were ideal for larger projects. This is how minimalism started. The purpose of minimalism was to simplify art to instead focus on structure and the more architectural content. According to the article, “Minimalism develops in sequences, but rarely in fields.” Post-minimalism became popular to bring back more aspects of a design to be formed into a field. Using a multitude of materials in a project is what differentiates minimalism and post-minimalism.

3. Thick 2D: Moires, Mats

Fields are two-dimensional compositions that contain diverse parts that work together as one. The moire effect is a set of lines or dots that differ slightly so that it appears there is movement or hierarchy within a field. When talking about fields in the urban context, the field is three-dimensional and created by combining thicker and intensified portions. These portions indicate intensity or power and should stand out over other parts of the field. 3D obviously allows the viewer to see the difference in height and range of certain areas, so in the 2D world the moire effect is what helps us differentiate those differences.

4. Flocks, Schools, Swarms, Crowds

Field conditions allows the possibility for architects to be able to study and understand the dynamics and behaviors of crowds. Architects can’t control every element of a project because how it is used in the real world isn’t predictable. The study of flocks and crowds helps architects start to understand these uncontrollable factors. Craig Reynolds computer program to monitor flock behavior informs us that groups are, “defined by precise and simple local conditions.” Their movement is based on the space available and their connection to other birds. They don’t group together automatically, but the space available is what flocks them together oftentimes. The same goes with people. Architects have to think about the space they are creating and how it interacts with the people using it.

5. Distributed Institutions

As society shifts and new times come with new expectations, architecture and field conditions must shift with society. A library thirty years ago had a much different use than it does now. Technology provides access to media. We no longer search out knowledge that exists within a library or museum. Because of that, architects have to think differently when designing those types of buildings to not only be relevant and useful now, but also in the future. Fields also have new definitions of parts to create a whole. Fields and spaces have to loosely fit the purpose of a design in order to stay relevant and necessary.

Lauren Preston

Print Friendly, PDF & Email