Reflections: The First Term of our Community Planning Workshop Project

Elizabeth Miller Madras Hazards Integration Plan CPW Community Planning WorkshopAs our team wraps up the winter term, I think it’s a good time to reflect back on our progress on our Community Planning Workshop project. Before my team started our project of incorporating the Madras Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan into the City of Madras’ Comprehensive Plan, few (if any) of us had never read a comprehensive plan. Similarly, most of us had not considered natural hazard mitigation planning as an important task for a city planner.

At the early stages of this project our team was given a considerable amount of reading to do. Between gaining a good understanding of the significant documents, the regulating agencies at play, and our scope of work, it took us almost three weeks to wrap our heads around our project concept, the keys players and documents involved, and task at hand that is our project. Not only did we have to learn these concepts for ourselves, but we also had to quickly figure out how to present the scope of our project and these concepts to our Community Planning Workshop class. Even more intimidating, our team would also so have to present to a committee of community leaders (our Technical Advisory Committee) in our fast-approaching meeting with them. Needless to say, there were several conversations with our project manager and our project advisor that entailed them re-explaining concepts to us, as well as there were many times when we found that we had to go back and re-read the numerous documents.

Our team had both the benefit and the misfortune of having our meeting with the Technical Advisory Committee pushed back three weeks due to a snow and ice storm (the irony of that situation wasn’t lost on us), requiring us to think on our feet and re-work our entire schedule. During these three weeks our team did further investigation of case studies and other relevant documents, so that by the time we reached our meeting, we really knew our content. What’s more, the meeting was a great learning experience, and solidified all of the knowledge we had been gathering throughout this process.

Recently our team did our final presentation of the term to our Community Planning Workshop class. Our team was only able to spend a small fraction of the time on this presentation than we did our previous presentations, and some of us were even set to speak on content that we had never done before. Despite this, our presentation went exceptionally well. The following day our team asked ourselves how we managed such a successful and succinct presentation. Ultimately our team’s understanding of our project, which came from the many hours of research, discussion, and experience discussing it in a professional setting, allowed us to speak confidently with our content.

Our team is now at a point where we’re synthesizing all of our research and work into major deliverables that include stakeholder interviews, a public survey, the initial process of drafting our key documents, and planning a public forum for next month. At the beginning of this term, I looked at these tasks with apprehension and nervousness. As we are going through this process now however, excitement has replaced apprehension. There’s something to be said about doing your homework, and something even more to be said about the professional experience that CPW offers.

 

Elizabeth Miller Madras Hazards Integration Plan CPW Community Planning WorkshopAbout the Author: Elizabeth Miller is a Community and Regional Planning student at the University of Oregon, and is additionally pursuing a certificate in Nonprofit Management. She is from Kalispell, Montana, and is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame with degrees in Fine Arts, Political Science, and Peace Studies.

What the Public Wants

Emily Kettell Community Planning Workshop CPW Madras Hazards NHMP Intergration

My Community Planning Workshop team, Madras Hazards Plan Integration Project,  is working in the City of Madras to update a chapter in the city’s comprehensive plan regarding natural hazards. You might think that this project sounds pretty simple; we do some research and we write our chapter of the comprehensive plan. However, that is not the case! As I’ve learned in my first two quarters of graduate school involving the public is a crucial step that can’t be overlooked even in writing a few short pages about natural hazards. While the team has certainly been doing its fair share of research, one of our key objectives is to see what the public wants is included  so that the city can effectively address natural hazards in Madras.

To start off with, what is a comprehensive plan, and why am I blogging about it?

Madras has to address 14 of the 19 Oregon statewide planning goals in its comprehensive plan. This long-range document outlines where a community is at currently, where it wants to be in future, and how it will get there. A community should consider what kinds of elements to include in its comprehensive plan. Some typical elements that are usually included are land use, infrastructure, housing, parks, and education. Information from the comprehensive plan will inform more specific policies and citywide ordinances.

It is important for residents to understand their city’s comprehensive plan because everyone is supposed to have a chance to give input as the plan is being developed. After all, you should get a say in how you want your home, neighborhood, and city to change over time. As we identify citywide goals and possible policies, there is no one better to tell us how the city could mitigate natural hazards, such as flooding, than the residents themselves!

To get this input, we are conducting initial interviews with 10-15 stakeholders in Madras. We are hoping that local officials and property owners with land in the floodplain can tell us what they think residents, business owners, and city officials should do to mitigate natural hazards in Madras. This is a very important step because while our team certainly has some great ideas for potential policies, we should not get the final say in regards to how Madras decides to reduce its risk to natural hazards.

From these interviews, our team hopes to get a general feel as to how key stakeholders feel, and then we are going to try and produce more specific questions in the form of an online survey for all residents of the city. Another way we will get residents involved is through a public forum that we are going to hold in April.

By the end of the interviews, surveys, and public forum, our team hopes that we can draft the natural hazards chapter for the comprehensive plan and tailor what we write to what the residents of Madras want, as well as create a natural hazards chapter that will effectively lead to policy to mitigate natural hazards in Madras. As someone not from Madras (or Oregon) I shouldn’t have the final say of the content in the comprehensive plan and am happy that our team is working so hard to find out what is important to residents and how to incorporate this information in the most effective way possible.
Emily Kettell University of Oregon Community Planning Workshop CPW Madras Hazards Plan Integration

 

Emily Kettell is a first year Community and Regional Planning graduate student. She moved to Eugene from Chicago where she received her Bachelors degree from DePaul University, majoring in French and Public Policy, with a concentration in Environmental Studies.