TEP at UO has these lovely ideas as well – click on expand when you get to the Sample Course Policies
New UO Student Conduct code is here! Highlights are summarized in a letter – they include definitions of plagiarism and mention of AI, found in Section IV of the new Code, under Academic Misconduct.
I like the clarity of this policy from San Jose State that includes wording around the use of grammar checking help: https://libguides.sjsu.edu/c.php?g=436654&p=9517043
TEP also points to the Sentient Syllabus project document including lots of other things to consider – syllabus language, rubrics with AI and more. They also point to a spreadsheet for folks to share what they are using that allows sorting by discipline. I didn’t find the STEM ones particularly unique.
I appreciate this consideration of what you do and don’t want to allow AI for. There was another one that I *will* find.
And, if you’re interested in how to use AI in your class, I’m very interested in your thoughts. Here are some to consider.
AI prompts for teaching, including information on how to have AI give feedback on a (short?) oral presentation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Lo4aeiWT4f5xhcsAbWAfQRITghBhcmFN2m-JEX5OkJA/edit
Syllabus resources in this Sentient Syllabus post include:
calling it “generative AI” (instead of ChatGPT, Bard, AI, etc.)
An example statement of Academic Integrity in the appendix (page 13).
see page 11 of the UO 2023 Bioinformatics & Genomics Track Student Handbook
TBR pile: Mollick, E. R. and Mollick, L. (2023). Using AI to Implement Effective Teaching Strategies in Classrooms: Five Strategies, Including Prompts. Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4391243