Bibliography
Artifact 2
Dissanayake, E. (1991). What is art for? In K. C. Caroll (Ed.). Keynote adresses 1991 (NAEA Convention), (pp.15-26). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Artifact 3
Jonathan Jones (2007, May). Food can be artistic – but it can never be art, The Guardian. Retrieved October 26, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2007/may/17/foodcanbeartisticbutitca
Telfer, E. (2002). Food as art. In Neill, A. & Ridley, A (Eds.), Arguing About Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates (2 ed., pp. 9-27). New York: Routledge.
Artifact 4
Carroll, N. (2002). Why Horror?. In Neill, A. & Riley, A. (eds.) Arguing About Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates (2nd ed., Chap. 17). New York, NY: Routledge.
Lauren Suval, ‘Why Are We Drawn to Horror Films?’, PsychCentral, Retrieved November 9th, 2014, from http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2014/01/04/why-are-we-drawn-to-horror-films/
Artifact 5
Grey, A. (2001). Art as Spiritual Practice. The Mission of Art (1st ed., pp. 205-233). Boston & London: Shambhala.
Artifact 6
Jones, B. J. (1990). Computer Graphics: Effects of Origins. LEONARDO: Digital Image – Digital Cinema Supplemental Issue, pp. 21-30.
Artifact 7
Lessig, L. (2008). Comparing Cultures. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy (pp. 84-116). New York: Penguin Press HC, The.
Lessig, L. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/larry_lessig_says_the_law_is_strangling_creativity.html
Artifact 8
Doss, E. (2006, October). Public art controversy: Cultural expression and civic debate. Retrieved from http://www.americansforthearts.org/pdf/networks/pan/doss_controversy.pdf
Previous Page: The Objectives
Main Page