Too bad, they don’t allow comments – just “a suggestion box” which only the admins can see. How 1950’s.
So I’m posting this, as a place for the UO community to comment on CAS matters. Here’s theĀ “Thinking about CAS” blog.
Too bad, they don’t allow comments – just “a suggestion box” which only the admins can see. How 1950’s.
So I’m posting this, as a place for the UO community to comment on CAS matters. Here’s theĀ “Thinking about CAS” blog.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Yet Another Dog Says this:
“Thinking about CAS” – is really a two way dialogue. I am really not much interested in reading about the Dean’s football weekend or any other light CRAP designed for humorous relief from the salt mines work. The first post does talk a bit about collaboration so I sent this to the suggestion box:
As almost all things UO – we tend to remain insular.
If the CAS deans are serious about collaboration (I don’t believe they are – I think they just want to talk about it) in one of the most anti-collaborative institutions I have ever seen (everyone one here only cares about protecting their budget and collaboration is usually viewed as a threat – this is the conversation we actually refuse to have) – then they might want to refer to extant work on this:
https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/collaborating-learn-learning-collaborate
http://berks.psu.edu/sites/default/files/campus/kezar.pdf
https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teamcollaborative-teaching/
http://opus.ipfw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=spe
http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/encouragingcl.htm
and indeed, the 1950s produce mass consumption and the sense of entitlement, all good, right …?