The main thesis in the article “Computer Graphics: Effects of Origins” suggestd that “…the origins and practices of computer graphics from 1945 to the present are examined to reveal cultural patterns embedded in their material and symbolic form” (Jones, 1990). Besides, the author also examined how these origins and practices exist in current art and technology. She claimed that it is the premise of the paper that old cultural patterns within art and technology do not die.

Additionally, I read an article by Martin Courtney called “Thin on the ground”, which examined advancements in desktop computers. He discussed the new trend for professionals, “bring your own device” (BYOD), and the fact that having mobility in a computer is easier than ever (Courtney, 2013, p.4). Looking at both the article by Jones and Courtney, it is apparent how far computer technology has come in the last 75 years and it is clear that advancements are going to only continue from here.

Personally, I belive that people relies more and more on computer technology not only it is more accurate and efficient but also safer and faster. The technology allows human to examine our own work, further more, it can do much more than human such as stimulating. In terms of art, people also relies more on technology to create more vivid image and visual effect such as CG in the movie. Thus, being aware of the development in technology is critical for human civilization.

In the article “Art as Spiritual Practice” wirtten by Grey infer an idea that what people actually see is different from what actually look. In his articale, grey aruged that “there is a vast difference between looking and seeing – a difference which is fundamental to the artist experience”. This argument indicates that different people may have difference perspective when they are looking at one thing, and this is because of different culture background and personal experience. Even more, the author also states that “in order to experience art fully viewers must go through a mini ego death by placing themselves in the insired mind of the airtst, who themselves are out of their minds and only acting as channels of creative spirit”. This is sayting that if poeple want to finish some artwork, they should not only looking at something but they should have a deep unsertanding and analysis while observe. However, I think everyone have their own understanding and style to create idea to approach creativity. Because people have different experiences, and there should not be a fixed standard to measure whether a person’s creativity is good or not. But in general, deeper observation is still a good way to help people to improve their creativity.