Personal Leadership Development

In the beginning of the term I set out to reach two goals. First,  I wanted to improve on the “Modeling the Way” component of Kouzes and Posner’s Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership by aligning my actions with my commitments. Second,  I wanted to build strong positive relationships with my teammates by having a better understanding of their goals, ethics, and work habits. My decision to focus on these two aspects was based on my Self-Assessment Survey scores and personal experiences as a leader on a sports team. Throughout the term, I measured the success of my progress through peer evaluations, verbal feedback, and by assessing our group cohesion and productivity.

Modeling the Way
Reflecting back on my experiences in BA 352, I can confidently say that I have become a more outspoken and self-assured leader. Although I haven’t mastered the “Modeling the Way” component of being a leader, I have made progress toward setting positive examples for my teammates. Throughout the term, I stayed highly motivated. I focused on being goal-oriented, organized, and prepared for all meetings and classes. Based on the peer evaluations, I received positive feedback on my progress:

“Very organized and motivated. Inspires group members to stay on track, and focused toward the the goal of our project. Takes initiative on research, and developing or ideas.”

“She always came to class and meetings prepared. Great at taking leading roles and making sure other people were getting help if they needed it.”

Since the beginning of the term, I have also improved my time management and commitment skills. I manage my time by setting deadlines for the tasks that are assigned to me by my group. For example, I completed the situation analysis of the proposal a couple days before my group was meeting, so my teammates could refer to it when writing their parts. This way I guaranteed completion of my section, helped my teammates, and was able to start revisions. To keep track of my commitments, I compiled my assignment deadlines, and appointments in an agenda the weekend before. This way I can visualize the workload I have for the week and better prioritize my time. The consistent verbal feedback and peer evaluations have helped me make progress toward improving this goal.

Relationship Management
For the most part, I am highly self-aware. I often reflect on my ideals, personality, and interactions with my peers. In addition to being self-aware, I regularly practice empathy–being able to put yourself in someone else’s shoes. Through these two aspects, I am able to maintain positive relationships and create unique bonds with the students in my class and my friends. In my Leadership Development Plan, I chose relationship management as a goal, because I struggled with balancing professionalism and friendship. At times I would simply agree with the consensus of the group, because I didn’t want to seem bossy or controlling. Then, there were times where I would feel so strongly about my point of view that I would dominate the whole conversation. This course has challenged me to find a balance between inquiry, advocacy, and dictatorship.

The real test came during week 7 of the term. After spending more than a month researching for our problem situation, discarding two solution outlines, and anticipating the due date of our final proposal, my group was frantic. We were stuck on the solution we originally conceived and didn’t know how to move beyond the obvious onto something more innovative. At this point, we were discouraged and frustrated with the project and each other. My thoughts swam and I wanted to have an epiphany, an idea, or any sense of direction. How do I get my group out of this rut and back on track? When I met up with my professor, Ron Bramhall, he suggested that we leave behind our current assumptions and focus on the problem itself. He advised us to find a solution that directly addressed our problem. Ron’s advice scared me, because it suggests that we would need to backtrack in order to move forward. My first thoughts were, “How do I break it to my group? How can I deliver bad news without being the bad guy? How can I steer them to the right direction?”

This was my opportunity step up as a leader, instill motivation, and maintain strong positive relationships with my team. First, I addressed this issue logically by explaining how our current solution would not successfully address the problem we want to tackle. Second, I had our group revisit our problem situation, objectives, and final goal for our proposal. This way, every team member is informed on what we wanted to achieve. Lastly, I opened up the floor so they can brainstorm new ideas and come to a group consensus for the new solution. I found this process to be successful, because I addressed the issue that Ron mentioned, and the whole team contributed to finding a better solution without me directing the conversation. In this situation, I was able to balance advocacy and inquiry in order to maintain a positive relationship with my group.

Developing Exemplary Leadership Qualities and Emotional Intelligence
During the last 10 weeks of BA 352, I have experienced many successes and failures while building the Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership. Although I have made major advances in relationship management and “Modeling the Way”, I find myself struggling with other aspects of the Five Practices and emotional intelligence. Half way through the term, I was so focused on taking initiative, delivering thoughtful ideas, and increasing productivity, that I started to drift away from the “Enabling others to act” component of leadership.  Instead of strengthening others by increasing self-determination and developing competence, I took on a lot of the work load. Based on peer evaluations, I sometimes practiced too much advocacy and not enough inquiry during group discussions. It is frustrating to receive this feedback, because I scored high in “Enabling others to Act” in my Self-Assessment Survey at the beginning of the term.

Balancing the five practices of leadership and all the components of emotional intelligence is extremely difficult. Sometimes, when I focus on improving certain aspects of my leadership qualities, I become less aware of the other factors involved. My experiences and struggles this term has made me realize that good leaders have to be continuously aware of their personal strengths and limitations. Moving forward from here, I will continue to focus on balancing the different practices of leadership and incorporating them into my daily life. In addition, I plan on building higher emotional intelligence by evaluating my relationships with my friends and teammates.

Professionalism Grade

In reflecting upon my punctuality, positive attitude, and preparation for the BA 352 course, I deserve a 47/50 for my professionalism grade. Throughout the term, I have consistently arrived early to class with the appropriate assignments completed and engaged in all group discussions. I presented myself in a professional manner during class by listening attentively, speaking appropriately, and focusing on the task at hand. I did not give myself a full grade, because I did not complete the Student Information Form in a timely manner. In addition, while reflecting on my in class participation, I wish I would have participated more during class conversations when Ron asked questions. The following sections provide a break down of the different aspects of professionalism on which I based my score.

Punctuality:
Throughout the term, I have consistently arrived early to my 8 AM class prepared with the assignments due and the course readings done. I have never missed a class and even arrived ten minutes early during presentation days to set up. In addition, I arrived promptly to all scheduled meetings with the Career Services advisors, and canceled appointments ahead of time if there was an unforeseen time conflict. I also haven’t missed any group meetings and always made sure to inform my teammates if I was going to be late.

Participation:
During group meetings I was very active and engaged during discussions about the final project. I actively led group discussions and collaborated with my teammates on finding the best fitting solution to our wicked problem. Unfortunately, after reflecting upon the last couple of weeks of class, I do believe I could have contributed more during class discussions. Even though I participated in all group conversations when the class broke off to focus on team projects, I wish I had engaged myself more in Ron’s discussions.

Respect for others:
When my teammates and I were collaborating on our final project, I was cooperative and respected their opinions. In addition, if I had a disagreement with a group member, I focused on giving productive feedback with a positive attitude in order to mediate conflicts. Since my teammates expressed that I practice too much advocacy and not enough inquiry, I have also been focusing on asking more questions in order to understand my teammates’ perspective.

Preparation:
During the 2nd week of the term, I was overdue on an assignment. Unfortunately for me, that was probably the least time consuming homework due for BA 352. It was unprofessional of me for not knowing the deadline which caused me to be unprepared for a class. After learning my lesson early on, I have yet to turn in an assignment late. I checked the course “To-Do List” before and after every class and started assignments earlier on to guarantee completion before the deadline.

Taking Initiative:
During this term, I took advantage of the resources and opportunities that were offered to me. I utilized Career Services multiple times for both resume and cover letter revisions, used the class readings as a resource when reflecting on my leadership development, and found an opportunity to interview with the Director of the UO Career Center. In addition, I volunteered to present the first problem proposal presentation and to write the situational analysis for our final proposal. Taking initiative was one of my best decisions for this class, because it led me to gain new perspectives and experiences for my personal growth.

Professionalism

Week 9: Winding Down

Finally, presentations are over, proposals are turned in, and writing assignments have been completed. After eight fast-paced weeks of class, BA 352–Leadership & Communication, has turned out to be one of the most applicable classes I have taken in LCB. Between writing my first cover letter to learning about the “Ladder of Inference”, I believe this class has given me a set of useful skills for me to apply toward my professional goals.

I enjoyed being challenged with the group assignments and projects. And by overcoming these challenges, I noticed a huge improvement in my presentation and public speaking skills. In addition, I am now much more aware of how to balance advocacy and inquiry when working with a team. Even though the changes I made aren’t drastic, I have gained a great deal of insight on how to manage team dynamics. I am also much more aware of how to effectively tackle problems and maintain team cohesion.

Overall, I am very glad I had the opportunity to work with my group and I am very proud of the work everyone has put in. Even though we all had different ideas and views on how to approach the final proposal project, we were able to eventually find the “better solution” to our problem situation. Furthermore, it was through Ron’s continuous push for us to dig deeper into the problem, where we  were able to challenge our usual approaches to research and problem solving.

To my surprise, I have gained much more from this class than I could have anticipated. I am looking forward to what next term will bring me when I take MGMT 325, MKTG 420, DSC 340, and PSY 301! Looking forward to spring term and of course, the sun!! Happy weekend everyone.

Rain to sun

Week 8: Ladies and Gentlemen of the EETF…

As we wind up our 8th week of progress for our final proposal project, we began working on our final presentation to the Lundquist College of Business Education Enrichment Task Force.

By this point, my group and I have already gotten used to meeting up three to four times a week to work on our project. We generally have a room reserved for 2-3 hours at a time. I usually come prepared with an outline for what we are working on and we always have set goals or milestones we want to reach by the end of every meeting. I’m glad to see how much our team has improved during the last month. We have managed to work out any disagreements, collaborate on ideas, and efficiently work toward our final presentation.

Looking back to our Team Agreement, listed below, I believe we did a great job sticking to what we wrote down. We mainly communicate via group messaging on iphones, shared roles and participation for all tasks, and took votes during group decision making. For the most part, this was successful for our group to stay focused and fix any altercations.

Team Agreement from Week 3:

Roles:
We to keep each other accountable for the weekly workload and group input. We believe in sharing leadership, and delegating assignments based on strengths and weaknesses of individuals in the group. Participation from quieter members will be in the form of their contribution in other ways, whether that be writing, research, or planning for the project.

Communication Process:
Feedback will be received by way of personal constructive criticism. Our team will stay in contact outside of meetings with the wonderful invention of IPhones. Group documents will be posted to Wiggio or Google Docs for further collaboration.

Decisions:
Team decisions will be made by consensus, being directed towards assignments or more important projects. One or two team members, using their best judgment, will decide smaller parts of assignments.

Growth

Week 7: Here we go again

After another week of research, interviews, and discussions with Ron, we are inching forward–toward finding the “better” solution to our problem. “There is no perfect solution to a wicked problem. Just good ones and not so good ones,” Ron reiterates to me as I sit in frustration during office hours. After having revisited the problem situation over a dozen times, I believe my group and I have finally touched upon the true issue. It was during Wednesday’s class exercise when we started figuring out the true problems behind the situation.

Situation: International students are not finding jobs in America, after graduation, within their allotted time.
Why it’s important: They are paying for the same education, opportunities, and experiences as domestic students, but they have to over come more challenges. It is LCB’s responsibility, as an educational institution, to provide optimal resources for all students.
Critical drivers of this issue: Legal issues, cultural differences, and stereotypes discourage employers from considering international students as valuable employees.
Goal: Raise international student’s potential to gain employment after graduating from LCB. Eventually, this will raise LCB’s reputation and competitive advantage.
Solution: Provide an International Student Liaison within the LCB Career Center to help international student’s with the legal aspects of OPT. Start an International Student Mentor Program with domestic students to help break down cultural and language barriers. Both of these aspects combined will help international students be more prepared and confident going into a job interview.

After conducting interviews with the International Affairs Advisor, the Director of the UO Career Center, and the Assistant Director of Career Services of LCB, we have a better understanding of the problem issue. I am fairly satisfied with the progress we have made over the last couple of weeks and I am excited to see it all come together in our proposal and presentation.

NACE

Week 6: Researching & Filtering

Observe. Research. Find the problem. Research, research, research. Analyze. Find a solution. Test it.

These are the straight forward, highly-summarized first steps to our “Flipd” process of solving a wicked problem. After going through the process with my group, I realized that breaking down to the basics of the process was the hardest part. During this process, I had difficulty not incorporating my own biases and problem ideas into the conversation. Thinking objectively while researching and holding interviews proved to be much more useful than leading with previous assumptions. Prior to hunting down the students of LCB, my teammates and I had already formed ideas and assumptions about the problem topics we were assigned. To our downfall, these assumptions led our interviews, research, and solution into many dead ends. Through the continuous cycle of “Flipd”, I realized how important it is to view and analyze every situation objectively. After we changed our approach to gathered information, we were able to find much more dynamic data.

Coupled with process of gathering information, is the process of filtering information. This operation is almost more complicated than the previous. To start, you must have a detailed  and clear understanding of your goal–what do you want the audience to take away? Then, after relentless hours of gathering and sorting data, you must decide which information is actually worth using. I find this process difficult, because I have a tendency to consider all data as “some-what” useful. To combat this issue, I have been revisiting my goals and objectives list frequently to make sure that I am still on track with my data research.

Think objectively. Don’t make your own assumptions. Understand the situation and the goals. –All ways to make the “flipd” process run more efficient & effective.

Too much information

Self-Evaluation

Before reading an excerpt from The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook,  Balancing Inquiry and Advocacy, by Peter Senge, I did not realize how many factors go into the dynamics of a team environment. With little need for self reflection, I already knew I practice more advocacy than inquiry. Although I believe I am semi-balanced in both,  I weigh strongly toward being more assertive. Many times this is a great trait–I am capable of being vocal about my opinions, I am not passive, I can articulate my ideas to others–but at other times, this can create friction when working in a group environment.

While working with a team that sways more toward inquiry, my traits become much more apparent. I state this not necessarily as a positive thing, because I’m worried that my advocacy will come off as dictating rather than asserting or explaining. To combat this problem, I will start practicing more inquiry and encouraging my teammates to be more vocal about their ideas and explanations.

advocacyinquiry

Week 5: Group Operation

Looking back at the last couple of weeks, working with my group, I believe we have made positive progress toward better collaboration, productivity, and cohesion. We meet every Tuesday morning to review and work on the week’s to-do list, and during the weekends, when we have major assignments to finish. During this time, we focus on the tasks at hand, getting our parts done, and setting goals/deadlines for future meetings.

Although we have productive meetings, I wish they were a bit more focused and efficient. At times, usually when we find ourselves stuck on a part of an assignment, we lose track and get off topic fairly easily. I understand that distractions happen when working in a group environment, but I hope as the project progresses and we have more finalized ideas, our productivity and efficiency will improve. Since group corporation is a major factor in efficiency, I believe our group is very capable of utilizing our time better.

While my group works well together, I wish they would be more vocal about their opinions and ideas. After spending about 8-10 hours with my group every week, I’ve come to realize that I practice more advocacy and they do more inquiry. In general, I am a fairly open, opinionated, and outspoken individual when it comes to my ideas, but my group is just the opposite. Even though, I don’t believe anyone necessarily shies away from speaking out or answering questions, many times ideas will “hover” in the room, without discussion. I would like to see my team members take more initiative in contributing to shared ideas and insights in helping us improve our proposal.

Overall, I am interested to see how our group will work through the next couple of assignments and make progress toward creating a well versed proposal and a professional presentation.

Group Projects

How to spot a liar

Since the second week of class, Professor Bramhall has been addressing the fact that “everybody lies”. He suggests that, often without bad intentions, everyone will lie to you at some point. This is important to consider when you try to solve wicked problems by asking the stakeholders what they want, because–based on facts–everybody lies. For the most part, Bramhall isn’t suggesting that you should always expect deception, but you must be aware of the accuracy behind every statement.

I came across an interesting TED Talk that touched upon this topic. In this video, Pamela Meyer, addresses some shocking facts about deception and how you can spot it.

Week 4: Wicked Problem

This past week, the class has begun research and preparation for our problem description presentations. My group has been going at a steady pace in regards to interviewing stakeholders, researching information online, and figuring out how to bring personality and emotion to our presentation. Our goal for Monday’s presentation, is to evoke sympathy and inspire action from our audience using a personal story and strong evidence to support our claims.

Frame: International students need a way to find jobs with higher placement rates, because they pay money to learn with the hope of starting a career.

We want to address the issue regarding international students success, or lack of success, in finding jobs and becoming fully integrated in America’s job market. After stakeholder interviews with international students, we found that many of them believe LCB lacks adequate resources tailored to mentor foreign students through the process of preparing for post-graduation job searches. With 21% of the current business school undergraduates studying as international students, we want LCB to adjust its approach to preparing foreign students for joining the American work force.

Learn: It’s especially true at the Lundquist College of Business that language and writing becomes an obstacle for international students to communicate professionally, cultural barriers make interviews more difficult, and legality reasons lengthens the job search process.

After interviewing Jessica Best, the Assistant Director of LCB Career Services, we realized that many variables play into the success of an international student’s job search and employment. In addition to language and writing barriers, every foreign student to overcome the major cultural differences in America’s job market. While language and writing can be improved through academic classes and tutoring, cultural integration occurs with experience and involvement. Currently, LCB career center only provides personal advising and one workshop per year, to help mentor international students with understanding “our way” of doing business.

As a domestic student, I find internship searches, resume and cover letter construction, and professional interviews extremely stressful–I can’t even imagine if I had to do this whole process in a foreign country.  As a business college with high rates of international student enrollment, LCB must put more emphasis on addressing their specific needs.

Wicked problem