Team 6, Question 3

Although a believer in God, and many of the same social views most Christians would hold to be ideals, Thomas Paine held a great disdain for Christianity. He thought that Christianity was a negative influence on history, and attacked it mercilessly in many of his writings. In “The Age of Reason”, he denied many of the biblical stories, and denied that God had communicated with humans at all. He said that many, if not all, of the biblical stories were not even true, instead being a collection of fables from many different authors. His views had him cast as an infidel to many, and after “The Age of Reason” many of his followers turned away from him because of how harsh his views were towards religion. He was left then to defend his views to some that he had called friend, or his contemporaries.

Paine says that all national institutions of churches are founded for the explicit out come of enslaving their people, and for the profit and power of those in charge. He viewed Christianity as a barrier for real social reform and moral justice, and throughout his life vehemently defended the separation of church and state.

Paine viewed revelation as a human construction. He states that while he Almighty has the power to be able to communicate with anyone at any time directly, it is foolish to believe that he has just from some second hand accounts of such an event. Revelation, in a religious sense, is the immediate realization of God’s word and instruction. In the revelation texts, we do not even get a first hand account of the prophets revelations, we get a second hand account of a followers conveyance of what the prophets told them. Paine does not view this as revelation anymore, because it is only revelation to the one spoken to by god. We then have to trust the word of some historian or writer from the time period, hoping that their word is good.

To Paine, revelation is a more singular event, that anyone can experience at any time. His revelation comes from simply examining the world around him. God’s word is spoken to him through the awe of the physical world, which he thinks could not exist without God’s power bringing it in to being. He says that “The word of god is the creation we behold.” This is because every man can experience it, it cannot be falsified or changed by another, and it is singular among all. If we behold the world, our understandings of God can be united as we will all see the same phenomena, without need for changing languages or withholdings.

Question 1; Team 2

During Voltaire’s terrestrial journey in his excerpt entitled “Religion”, Voltaire finds himself deep in contemplation, which leads to a dream where he encounters a history of Christianity. His illusory journey begins when he finds himself marveled at the creation of the Milky Way, “One must be blind not to be dazzled by this spectacle; one must be stupid not to recognize the author of it; one must be mad not to worship him.”(119) Voltaire’s Deism does not reject Christianity. He begins this passage on Religion claiming that there is reason to glorify that which made creation. His dream takes flight though and shows the underbelly of religion. Voltaire is taken by a guide, who leads him through fields of white bones. It is explained at each heap the reasons why these Christians died: Heresy, “metaphysical quarrels”, “religious wars”. The wreckage of Christian dogma was tangible. Voltaire was introduced to famous men of the past who had been persecuted by Christians for wrong believing. He engages is a lengthy conversation with Socrates who tells him that Priests were at the other end of the hemlock which he consumed.

Voltaire’s point is made clear, when the last individual he meets who is bleeding and torn open tells of his persecution story. He was beaten and killed for telling others to love. Voltaire inquires if it was based on a new belief or if he was trying to start a new religion, the man answered no. He followed the customs and rituals prescribed of his day, yet was killed. The gentleman was Jesus and Voltaire was successful in relaying his message of Christianity being an established body that did not follow the words of a man who taught love, but had grown to become based on power and wealth. The true glory of God was not to be found in church doctrine, but in stargazing.

“…Let us pardon reciprocally each other’s folly. That is the first law of nature”(129) In both “Religion” and “Tolerance”, Voltaire expresses the responsibility of humans to respect and love each other, The Golden Rule. In “Religion”, he bases this claim off of the teaching of Jesus, to love thy neighbor, he then comes back to give examples of Christians doing just the opposite. “But the government! But the Magistrates! But the princes!” (129) Voltaire is calling out officials who claim the sanctity of Christianity but lack the values. Deists, according to Holmes, would often believe in the ethical teachings of Jesus, but not his status as God. Voltaire goes as far as claiming that if we were to really adhere by Christian teachings, we should all be Jewish, because Jesus was. He is stripping away the ethereal to the real, what can be proved by reason and facts.

Voltaire in his work “Superstition” calls out this “ethereal” as magic, and magic leads to fanaticism. He names the sacraments of the Catholic Church as acts of superstition which are ultimately dangerous because they allow for people to be controlled and fanaticism to grow, which leads to misery. Voltaire though at times sounds “un religious”, in a way is claiming a new form of salvation; by living free of the bondage of dogma. Although Deist claimed to not be a new religion, it is an entirely new lens in which to view who God is and how he works, or does not, in the world.

Team 1: Duncan, question 1

François-Marie Arouet, more commonly known by his pen name Voltaire, was a French Enlightenment writer, historian, and philosopher famous for his wit, his attacks on the established Catholic Church, and his advocacy of political agendas. Voltaire was apart of the Deist movement which a belief in which God has created the universe but remains apart from it, permitting his creation to administer and stuard itself and all creation  through natural laws. Deism does not hold to the supernatural aspects of religion, like the idea that God gave his revelation through the Bible, but rather, it stresses the importance of ethical conduct/morality.

Voltaire was a towering intellect whose Enlightenment understanding of the world influenced his views of religion (and Christianity).’ (Dr. Reis). Through natural revelation Voltaire sees and understands just a part of the greatness of God. Natural revelation is the idea that everyone is without excuse to acknowledge the existence of God merely by the sight of nature. Nature could not simply appear by chance, it is too intricate and beautiful, it must have had a creator, that creator being God. Voltaire reminisces on a night where he was overcome with admiration and realization of the magnitude of nature and what he does not know. He references the amount of knowledge and wisdom it must take to be able to create such beautiful things that work in harmony together saying “I admired still more the intelligence which directs these vast forces. I said to myself: ‘One must be blind not to be dazzled by this spectacle; one must be stupid not to recognize the author of it; one must be mad not to worship Him.'”(The Portable Enlightenment Reader, pg 119). Voltaire says the obligation of all humans is to give tribute/worship to God since He created everything. The existence of God also dictates how Voltaire thinks humans should interact toward one another having an obligation to help those when we can and to not leave deads in our power undone for all are created by God, so therefore, have equal dignity and worth. Voltaire goes on a radical cosmic journey with a guide to where he speaks to multiple ‘Greats’ from history and they give him insight. Finally it is revealed to Voltaire that the one true religion, and Law for those in existence,for all is “Love God and your fellow creature as yourself”. (The Portable Enlightenment Reader, pg 124).

Voltaire’s world view focuses heavily on how people are treated in the socio-economical setting. When speaking about tolerance, Voltaire says “It is clear that the individual who persecutes a man, his brother, because he is not of the same opinion, is a monster.” (The Portable Enlightenment Reader, pg 129).

Team 4, Question 2

Writing after the Enlightenment had concluded in America, Thomas Jefferson expressed his views of religion and Christianity with his document “Notes on Virginia.” In the opening paragraph, Jefferson declares that “reason and free enquiry are the only effectual agents against error” (160). He describes these two agents as the enemies of error, with the power to eviscerate all false beliefs from society. Jefferson argues that reason and free inquiry must exist in all facets of the government, citing the Roman government’s decision to allow free inquiry centuries earlier. As a result of this, Christianity was introduced in the tolerant empire, and it henceforth has thrived as a societal pillar. Continuing, Jefferson asserts that reason and free inquiry will not lead to uniformity, and that “difference of opinion is advantageous in religion” (161). Attempts to enforce uniformity by means of coercion have caused devastating effects at many points in history. Therefore, free enquiry must be permitted and encouraged, and reason, Jefferson argues, will naturally follow. If this system is followed in precise detail, the rights of each citizen will thereby be protected.

In penning his letter to Benjamin Rush, Jefferson declares that he formulated his views on religion as a “result of a life of inquiry and reflection,” echoing his sentiments from his Notes on Virginia document (163). He declares himself to be a Christian, meaning that he is “sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others” (163). Jefferson discusses the importance and primacy of conscious, something he believes is in harmony with the teachings of Jesus. He speaks of the importance of trying to attain “every human excellence,” and subsequently implies that all other myth based ascriptions are false forms of Christianity. His experiences of trying to live a model Christian life compel him to assemble a syllabus, outlining the comparative merits of Christianity. He does this by offering a comparative view of the Ethics of Philosophers, Jews, and Christians. To begin this document, Jefferson offers his analysis of the ethics of Greco-Roman philosophy, which he argues successfully “disturb(s) the tranquility of mind” (164). For this accomplishment, he applaudes the philosophers. However, in the field of developing duties to other people, Jefferson asserts that Greco-Roman philosophy is largely unsuccessful. They fail to emphasize the “circle of benevolence,” which is implicitly the path to living a Christ like life (164). Next, Jefferson discusses the Jews, analyzing that though they are monotheistic, or Deists in his words, they did not accurately understand the true character and qualities of the one true God. He calls Jewish Ethics before their reformation, “irreconcilable with the sound dictates of reason and morality,” rendering them incompatible with a just society. Finally, he evaluates Jesus and Christianity, first by acknowledging that there do exist some disadvantages for Christian doctrine. For example, Jesus himself never wrote anything. He also notes the argument that because Jesus lived only thirty-three years, he therefore did not present a complete set of morals. However, Jefferson continues to state that the system of morals provides by Jesus and promulgated by Christianity are in fact “the most perfect and sublime that has ever been taught by man” (165). He presents Jesus as a teacher and spiritual healer, claiming that he fixed the Jews’ view of God, “giving them juster notions of his attributes and government” (165). Jefferson then states explicitly that Jesus’ moral doctrines were and are far superior to the teachings of the philosophers and the Jews. The application of what Jefferson called “universal philanthropy” contributes to Jesus’ higher moral position (165). Additionally, Jesus’ teachings should be looked upon as authoritative due to his ability to push his scrutinies into the heart of each individual. Finally, Jefferson concludes his document with the assertion that Jesus taught “the doctrines of a future state,” and was unwavering in his insistence on furthering and promulgating these doctrines for all just societies (166).

Thomas Jefferson’s was clearly influenced by the Enlightenment ideas that preceded him. Trademark of the Enlightenment period was the importance of free thinking, and Jefferson echoed this sentiment with his belief that uniformity was impossible. He cites that the government must accept all religious faiths, and employ “reason and persuasion” in order to influence people to believe what is true (162). Clearly, Jefferson believes that there is a true faith, namely Christianity, but Jefferson contends that people must realize this truth on their own, rather than have it presented to them by force. This manner of thinking was clearly the result of Enlightenment influence, which stressed the importance of having a personal experience and relationship with God.

Team 3, Question 2

In Jefferson’s only full-length book, Notes on Virginia, he states his true beliefs about societal issues. Jefferson states that both the mind and body are subject to the coercion of laws. Jefferson continues about the power of government, saying, “But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it dies me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no god” (page 160). Jefferson talks about the government’s role in the church and the injustices that often occur. Jefferson said, “If it be said, his testimony in a court of justice cannot be relied on, reject it then, and be the stigma on him. Constraint may make him worse by making him a hypocrite, but it will never make him a truer man. It may fix him obstinately in his errors, but will not cure them. Reason and free enquiry are the only effectual agents against error” (page 160). Jefferson goes into further depth about the corruption of leadership. He says, “Had not the Roman government permitted free enquiry, Christianity could never have been introduced. Had not free enquiry been indulged, at the aera of the reformation, the corruptions of Christianity could not have been purged away. If it be restrained now, the present corruptions will be protected, and new ones encouraged” (page 161). Jefferson explains the government as containing “fallible men; men governed by bad passions, by private as well as public reasons” (page 161). He explains the reasoning for the error-filled society that the government has built, saying, “And why subject it to coercion? To produce uniformity. But is uniformity of opinion desirable? No more than of face and stature” (page 161). Many people have suffered in the journey of Christianity trying to reach pure uniformity, and yet it is unknown if reaching that potential is even possible.

Jefferson futher explains his beliefs in detail in a letter to Benjamin Rush. Jefferson says, “To the corruptions of Christianity I am, indeed, opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian in the only sense he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines, in preference to all others; ascribing to himself every human excellence; and believing he never claimed any other” (page 163). Philosophers did a good job in creating precepts that relate to the people and the governments. They “embraced, indeed, the circles of kindred and friends, and inculcated patriotism…as a primary obligation…” (page 164). However, they lacked in creating “peace, charity and love to our fellow men, or embraced with benevolence the whole family of mankind” (page 164). Jews believed in one God, Deism. “But their ideas of him and of his attributes were degrading and injurious” (page 164). Jefferson believed they needed reformation. Jesus is described of being of poor condition and his education mull. He is also described as being meek, patient, firm, disinterested, and benevolent. He lived his life correct and innocent. Jesus wrote nothing himself and the recordings of his works are only from memory, and after much time after the event, recorded by the “ignorant men” who heard him preaching or saw his kindness. Jefferson claims that Jesus fell victim to jealousy of the altar and the throne. Jefferson believes the doctrine to be “defective as a whole, and fragments only of what he did deliver have come to us mutilated, misstated, and often unintelligible” (page 165). Jefferson says that Jesus created a system of morals that “would be the most perfect and sublime that has ever been taught by man” (page 165). Jefferson praises these morals. Jefferson states with approval of these four works of Jesus: 1. He corrected the Deism of the Jews, confirming them in their belief of one God, and giving them juster notions of his attributes and government. 2. His moral doctrines, relating to kindred and friends, were more pure and perfect than those of the Jews; and they went far beyond both in inculcating universal philanthropy, not only to kindred and friends, neighbors and countrymen, but to all mankind, gathering all into one family, under the bonds of love, charity, peace, common wants and common aids. A development of this head will envince the peculiar superiority of the system of Jesus over all others. 3. The precepts of philosophy, and of the Hebrew code, laid hold of actions only. He pushed his scrutinies into the heart of man; erected his tribunal in the region of his thoughts, and purified the waters at the fountain head. 4. He taught, emphatically, the doctrines of a future state, which was either doubted, or disbelieved by the Jews; and wielded it with efficacy, as an important incentive, supplementary to the other motives to moral conduct.

Jefferson’s view of Christianity is parallel to those that are Enlightenment-influenced because his viewpoint is founded on the belief of liberty and equality. Jefferson criticizes the government and seeks out for a change, including a lack of corruption and an acceptance of all religions and beliefs. Jefferson says in his Notes on Virginia, “Let us reflect that it is inhabited by a thousand millions of people. That these profess probably a thousand different systems of religion. That ours is but one of that thousand. That if there be but one right, and ours that one, we should wish to see the 999 wandering sects gathered into the fold of truth. But against such a majority we cannot effect this by force. Reason and persuasion are the only practicable instruments. To make way for these, free enquiry must be indulged; and how can we wish others to indulge it while we refuse it ourselves” (page 162). Jefferson reiterates his belief in the separation between church and state. He gives examples and explains that both Pennsylvania and New York are not tied down with a religious establishment and have still been very successful. They are deemed successful in the eyes of Jefferson because they have sustained peace and order. He goes on, saying, “They have made the happy discovery, that the way to silence religious disputes, is to take no notice of them. Let us too give this experiment fair play, and get rid, while we may, of those tyrannical laws. It is true, we are as yet secured against them by the spirit of the times” (page 162). Along with these beliefs, Jefferson also felt strongly about the blasphemy of superstition.

Team 2 Question 1

In Winthrop’s legendary sermon “A Model of Christian Charity” he famously presents his views towards how life should be lived in the colonies. The Puritans were going off into a new world, where they could easily lose touch to their faith, so Winthrop emphasized that salvation was achieved by “doing justly, loving mercy, and walking with God.”

Winthrop encourages his fellow Puritans to embody a few characteristics as they reach their new home. The first of these being that the people should “account themselves knit in their bond of love” and embrace that bond in their lives to help each other and themselves. The second being that the needs of the public must be sought before any private issue in aims to establish a healthy relationship between church and state. Thirdly, we should strive to improve our lives so that we can better serve our Lord and resultantly improve oneself through serving the Lord. Finally, Winthrop encouraged the Puritans to do the amount of good deeds they had or would have done in England in their new home to keep their brotherhood and share their faith.

Winthrop envisions that the community will have a strong collective belief in God and that their shared belief will contribute to a positive lifestyle where members of the community help each other when they can. As Micah 6:8 states; “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” Winthrop hopes that the group will follow scriptures like this so that they can live a humble life and avoid corruption. If the people live life according to God’s will, they will be collectively living good, loving, generous lives.

The following passage had a strong influence on Winthrop’s perception of the role of the new community; “You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house.  In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.” (Matthew 5:14-16) Through passages like these Winthrop was able to conclude that the role of the new community was to be a religious beacon in the new world.

If I were a Puritan who was going to leave England and heard Winthrop’s speech, I would be deeply inspired. Leaving my home and everything I know would be such a scary thing to do, but Winthrop’s claims that we could all be alright if we stuck to each other and kept faith during this crazy time would give me something to hold to. My mentality towards the situation would shift from being terrified to confident as I accept that the only way to survive this sinking ship is to work together, and to love one another through a bond in faith.

Team 3: Question 1

Winthrop encourages his fellow Puritans to embody their duty of mercy which he said to be “exercised in the kinds: giving, lending and forgiving of debt.” (59).  He goes on to give the definition of love through scripture which is “love is the bond of perfection” meaning that love isn’t perfect but perfection makes love (perfection being Christ). Love isn’t just one being but many beings knitted together with Christ who is perfection which then makes love. All the pieces of this body are different sizes and are just different in every way but when they are put together through Christ it becomes the most well made and beautiful body there is. Winthrop hopes to have this theme of love implemented into their new community by: professing themselves members of Christ, dual form of government (civil and ecclesiastical), do more service, love one another no matter what.

Winthrop sees the relationship between the community and God as a love relationship but more of a tough love. If one was to ignore the four articles of the community and instead they cared about their own self they would feel God’s wrath. So they have to follow the articles very strictly because that is what God expects from them. The curse of God can be avoided only be following the counsel of Micah: “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God”(Micah 6:8). Simply saying to take the image of being knitted together with Christ seriously. One should never go through anything alone and should not rise above his brother but instead give something up when he is in need.

Winthrop’s view on the new community directly relates to how Matthew describes it: “You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.”(Matthew 5:14-16). This meaning that everyone has the opportunity to be the light or guide for someone else and influence them to do good. By being good and living by the articles set in place for the community you are able to be seen and appreciated by your fellow followers of Christ. These good deeds are to not be hidden but to be shown to all and help others to rise up and be apart of the body.

I feel as though if I were to be in the situation where I was leaving England and going off to start a new life in a new community I would rely on what Winthrop is saying in his speech. Even now these sound like good and valid guidelines to live ones life. Also, coming from a place like England at the time and then being told that I am stitched together with this community by God would be very empowering in my opinion. I think having that outlook that in a way we are all literally made with God from God and I always have Him and I am connected with my peers through him would feel comforting during this big transition.

Team 4: Question 2

During the 18th century, a wave of Pietistic influence came to the United States. During this time, many Christians in North American colonies felt that a personal religious experience held a great importance to the Christian lifestyle. The Great Awakening first appeared in the United States in 1734 in Northampton, Massachusetts. The Great Awakening was a schism between the teachings of Westminster, the Old Side, and the New Side. The outcome of this schism was the Great Awakening. Jonathan Edwards was the pastor in Northampton. He was a Calvinist that had previously been trained at Yale (288). He believed that it was important to have a personal experience of conversion for ones faith. He found that for several years, his sermons were average and he was not getting the response that he had hoped for, but in the year 1734, he saw a change in the response to his sermons. They were finally touching people. People were having emotional responses to his sermons and some were even having emotional outbursts. As this spread throughout New England, people were having extraordinary responses to sermons. Some were so over whelmed that they cried in repentance for their sings, some shouted with joy, and a few were so overwhelmed that they fainted (289). These dramatic reactions to the sermons caused enemies of the Great Awakening to criticize it and claim that they were undermining the importance of worship and that the leaders should place a greater emphasis on study and devotion.

In “Sinners in the Hands of God by Jonathan Edwards, he explains his beliefs on hell and human arrogance. Edwards explains that humans think that they will automatically be saved from damnation and escape hell without God. Edwards does not describe humans in a positive manor. He talks of their wickedness and how they are damned if they do not have God and how God is the only thing that holds them up from hell. Edwards places a large emphasis on the importance in believing in God and this is the one way to escape damnation. He mostly depicts God as angry and mentions the wrath and anger of God. Edwards uses descriptive language when describing the relationship between human and God. He describes God as being the only thing holding humans up. He says “there is nothing between you and hell but the air; it is only the power and mere pleasure of God that holds you up.” He explains God as using his pleasure as holding humans up which makes me think he is emphasizing his mercy and that he has the power over humans.

Team 6 Question 2

The Great Awakening was a schism between two sides, the Old Side and the New Side. The Old side insisted on following the strict teachings of Westminster, where as the New Side believed it was all about the experience of redeeming grace. Jonathan Edwards, a pastor in  Northampton, sermons preached on the need for an experience of conviction of sin and of divine forgiveness.(pg.288) Edwards invited George Whitefield to preach at his church, where Edwards was thought to have wept during Whitefield’s message. This evoked many other traditions, such as Anglicans, Presbyterians and Congregationalist, to change the way they preached. The new way caused people to feel a need to weep for repentance, shout for joy and even faint because of the overwhelming presence. Other people saw these acts as undermining the seriousness that worship is supposed to be and thought that the leaders were more focused on emotion rather than study and devotion. The Awakening eventually become more favorable to the Baptists and Methodists ways. Infant baptism was no longer seen as probable and was rejected from the church. Instead new ideas of human rights and government began to surface among the people. 

In “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Jonathan Edwards explains that they are all sinners and will be judged by God in unpleasant and painful ways. Edwards believes that men think they know how to avoid perishing in hell and they will be okay by themselves, without God.He describes people as wicked and already lost to sin because it is in the world. God is under no limiting force when punishing those who have sinned.  Each metaphor used by Edwards reflects how horrible sinners are in the eyes of God. Edwards considerers that there is no room for pride in the eyes of God, that they must be transformed completely through the awakening. Edwards explains that Jesus stands in the door calling and crying with a loud voice to sinners, pleading with those who are doomed to convert, to accept the saving grace of Him.

Edwards compares the sinner to a spider about to be thrown into a fire in order to highlight the repulsiveness of sin and the danger that the sinner is in. This metaphor gives an image that a sinner, weighed down by sin, has no more chance of avoiding hell than a spider’s web has of stopping a rock. Another vivid rhetoric is “The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked…” This quotes intended effect was to show fear and timidness, Edwards goal was to make the congregation feel insignificant, which would ultimately lead them to change their life through the acceptance of God

 

 

Skip to toolbar