Team 4, Question 1

Christianity can be considered the central conflict in the First World War, and a supporting reason in the Second World War. The First World War was fought with religion at the forefront of the fight. The churches of most countries involved advocated for the fight for Christ, telling soldiers they were doing gods work. The first world war was a crusade for both secular and religious power. In the end though, the soldiers fighting did not even know what cause they were fighting for. World War Two was waged less with religion in mind and more with the concern to preserve national pride. When Germany invaded Poland a tangled web of alliances was engaged. Hitler’s quest for control over the European continent and the religiosity of its people meant that the Jewish population, long labeled Christ-killers by Christians, was to be persecuted. What followed was the most horrific event in human history. The post-war Europe was faced with trying to figure out why the wars were justified of God planned out history. The Holocaust was determined to “an expression of sin and human choice, and therefore not gods will” (electronic copy). Following this, France adopted a policy of laïcité, or “governmentally enforced secularization” (electronic copy). After WWII, Russia was given control over most of Eastern Europe, but the individual territories and countries had control over their churches. Countries such as Albania declared national atheism, whereas Poland was devoutly Catholic. While Russian government declared atheism before the Iron Curtain fell, after 1990 Russian government aligned itself closely with the church.

The secularization of modern Europe has contributed to the drop in recent church attendance. Between secularization and immigration, modern Europe looks very different than the Europe of even a century and a half ago. Only half of Europeans say they believe in God, “and secularization is deeper and more evenly dispersed across Protestant Europe than in either Catholic or Orthodox Europe”. In addition, Eastern Europe is generally less secular than Western Europe, “even though Eastern Europe experienced decades of forced secularism under communist rule, while Western Europe became secular with no coercion at all” (electronic copy). The number of immigrants to Europe, specifically Western Europe has increased greatly over the past few decades. Though there has always been a Muslim population in Eastern Europe, the Muslim presence in the western part of the continent is relatively new. In fact, “in France, the number of religiously practicing Muslims is now roughly equal to the number of Catholics attending Mass every week” (electronic copy). These immigrants practice their faith publicly, but in Europe the social and sometimes even legal rule is that there is to be a “nakedness” of the public sphere (electronic copy). European individuals have drifted away from church because of the progression of secularism in the region. However, because this has taken place so “unreflectively”, many Christian beliefs and attitudes are still practiced unconsciously, making anything different appear bad (electronic copy).
In addition to the Muslim presence in Europe, there is a large number of African and Asian immigrants in Western Europe, who have set up their own churches. These congregations draw sometimes thousands of people, revitalizing and changing how European Christianity looks. Baptism numbers are declining and there are less and less priests marrying couples. There are more children born to single mothers and even less babies being born in general. Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI spoke out often against birth control and said the declining birthrates were due to a “dimming of hope” (electronic copy).

European Christians place great emphasis on truth. They want to prove Christianity as true. The apostle Paul preached to people not to be deceived by holly arguments, but declared that sound reasoning and good arguments were in line with Christian beliefs. Truth comes from the ground up, as according to Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas both philosophized. If you can experience it with your senses and have argument and proof, then it is in line with God as well. Aquinas believed the existence of “of God could be proven on the basis of evidence-based, logical thinking. By joining reason with revelation, mere belief could be turned into solid, demonstrable knowledge” (electronic copy). Christianity’s beliefs in the order of nature of the universe could be considered the foundation of modern science. Though there was a tense relationship between the two in the past, with scientists labeled as heretics and put to death, the proof of these discoveries forced the Church to recant its statements.

Post-modernism and the opinions that come with it have cast a cynical lens to Christianity. European Christians believed in their ability to rationalize God to the point where Eastern Orthodox believers considered their actions tantamount to idolatry. The focus was moved away from God as the Creator and onto the natural earth. “Pavel Florensky, an Orthodox theologian asked “how the fullness of God and God’s relationship to the world could possibly “be packed into a narrow coffin of logical definition?” (electronic copy). The only way to know God was through personal meditation. Focusing on God could illuminate what it meant to be human without sacrificing the truth of science and rationalism. For both postmodern Christians and Orthodox Christians, “true truth” is the truth of our own fallibility and of humanity’s need for divine aid. This belief teeters on the edge of commitment to Christian ideals in hand with modern objectivity while also posing the risk of “sliding back relativism that rejects the importance of science and rationality and declares that anyone can believe whatever he or she wants to believe regardless of evidence and reason” (electronic copy). Ultimately, the belief that truth is not made of opinions, but of proven facts, will continue to influence post-modern European Christendom. Though truth has existed alongside God before, the lack of faith in the Church and the lack of verity of God will most likely further distance Europe from Christianity, making way for a different Christian empire.

Team 4, Question 2

The Shaker’s official name is The United Society of Believer’s in Christ’s Second Appearing, lead by Ann Lee Stanley, or Mother Ann. Stanley received revelations from God leading her to believe she was the second coming of Christ in female form. Since he had come previously as a man, and in keeping with their “dualism” belief in nature, the Shakers accepted that his second coming would be as a woman. Though they lived communally, Shaker beliefs required they “abstain from sex, which is the root of all evil” (Gonzalez 326). The Shakers believed the end of the world was at hand and that the Kingdom of Heaven was to be established on Earth, causing the downfall of the antichrist. Shakers were persecuted throughout England for their Spiritualistic beliefs. Mother Ann received visions from God telling her to build a society in America, where the Second Christian Church would be, and that the colonies were to gain their independence, letting the Shakers “worship without hindrance or molestation” (Setzer and Shefferman 224).

The Shaker’s belief in Mother Ann being the second coming of Christ lead to their many apocalyptic beliefs. In the Gospel there is a “fourth and last great cycle” which would be the “time for ‘the restitution of all things, which God had spoken by the mouth of all his prophets” (Setzer and Shefferman). Because Ann Lee Stanley received visions from God, thus making her a prophet, the apocalypse was predicted.

William Miller was raised as an American Baptist in New York. As a student of the Bible, he believed in deism as a young adult, but eventually returned to “views of a providential God” after his “survival at the Battle of Plattsburgh” (Setzer and Shefferman 227). Miller used the Bible, in particular the recordings of Daniel and John, to calculate the “passing of a 2,300-year period before the return of Christ”, identifying 1843 as the year of the apocalypse (Setzer and Shefferman 227).

Miller considered the prophecy he had calculated to be “somewhat different than other parts of Scripture” since these beliefs were shared amongst several different Biblical prophets. He cites numerous passages in the Bible that seem to echo each other, including Revelations 18:7, Daniel 12:1, and the Gospel of Matthew, “For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.” (KJV Matthew 24:21) All of these verses seemed to point toward the second coming of Christ. Because the first coming was so well predcted, he believed that since the Bible pointed to a second coming it made sense to follow the Biblical prophecies for his second coming. Miller shared his discovery so that every individual would “be prepared that that day may not come upon them unawares (238).

Ellen G. White was an “Adventist” and disciple of Miller. Despite the day he had predicted the Kingdom of God to arrive on Earth passing without incident, White and several others believed the “Second Advent was still at hand… and the process had been set in motion in 1844” (229). White began having visions, convincing her of the time and place of the Second Advent of Christ. She was a founder of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, and explained her vision for Christian education in her book The Book of Books, “the study of the Bible will give strength to the intellect” and “without the Bible we should have been left to conjectures and fables in regard to the occurance of past ages” (230). White and the Adventists believed that without the guidance of the Bible, worshipers would have no idea of when the Second Coming was to occur. She also wrote that if the Bible were applied in everyday life those who studied it would bebrought up from “earthliness and debasement”, ensuring they would not be lead into temptation and sin (230). If people were to meditate on God they would receive a strengthening off their spirit. God would not accept those who belittled him into Heaven. By studying and implementing the Bible, worshipers would be able to enter Heaven. White quotes Revelations 22:12-14 as proof that through belief and study of the Bible, believers would be allowed to enter Heaven.

Team 4, Question 2

It is unclear as to what caused John Calvin’s split from the Catholic Church. While he originally wished to study theology, a falling out between his father and the bishop who held jurisdiction over Calvin’s hometown of Noyon caused him to pursue a path in law. After his father’s death, Calvin returned to Paris to finish his degree in theology. Calvin wrote little about the state of his soul, instead possibly drawing on the influence of his fellow humanists. These peers seem to have helped him come to the decision to withdraw from the Catholic faith and pursue Protestantism. John Calvin’s studies of the Bible lead him to  envision a society governed by Bible and its teachings, not the interpretations of Rome and the Catholic Church. This strict and dogmatic faith was incorporated into a document written by Calvin called The Geneva Ordinances.

Ordinances envisioned a society governed only by the Bible, observing that Catholic Church tradition has strayed from the Word and there is no authoritative interpretation of the Bible by a human. According to Calvin, only God has the authority to interpret scripture. It also taught that God predestined whom he wanted to predestine, without consideration of the predestined people’s merits. Calvin interpreted the Bible literally, and his followers did so as well.

Calvin sought to integrate theological ideals through punishment. According to Ordinances, they ranged from a fine of five to ten sous to an hour in the pillory for blasphemy to three days imprisonment for unworthy songs. Games played for money could earn a fine of five sous to the loss of money won, while drunkenness earned a fine of three to ten sous and imprisonment. The consistory, the council of community leaders, as well as the secular lords who governed local areas carried out these punishments. These guidelines reflect the concepts of the Reformation and the resistance of the excessive lavishness of the Catholic Church. The regulations of this strict society included imprisonment, fines paid for misbehavior and given to the poor and the authorities, and admonishment by the consistory, who were elected by the Church.

Calvin believed these regulations served as an improvement over the Catholic-led society because they offered a relationship with God that was unaffected by material possession. Calvin’s wish to create a Christian community manifested in a society that was not only ruled by the government, but by the Church as well.

Skip to toolbar