Team 7, Question 1 Asia

Asian Christianity is separated by four geographic regions in Jacobs writings. These four regions are: Islamic west Asia, Hindu south Asia, Religiously mixed southeast Asia, and Buddhist/secular east Asia. The Christian population in Islamic west Asia is at four percent and is continually getting smaller. Many of the Christians that reside is west Asia today and are in the more populated christian communities are “guest workers” that often come from the Philippines for labor and domestic work. They reside in the gulf nations that produce oil. Life for these Christian workers is that of never ending servitude. Once working in the country they are payed low wages and often have their passports stripped from them, unless there employers grant them travel. Like west Asia Christians in South Hindu Asia only take up four percent of the overall population. However they live a much different lifestyle than those in west Asia, Those in south Asia live in more populated communities of Christians and have a higher social status. Christianity is thriving is southeast Asia. The Philippines itself has 90 million Christians. Christianity is over represented in the minority groups, and thus conversion has become a way of identity for those minorities. Secular east Asia has the fastest growing population of Christians in Asia, with the population growing with a nine percent increase over the last 40 years. The quality of life is quite different in the different states throughout east Asia however. This is show through South and North Korea. In south Korea Christians are highly respect and six of South Koreas past eleven presidents have been Christian. In north Korea however, the state is committed to atheism and Christianity is forbidden. In the other parts of secular east Asia conversion of religions is seen as punishable by death. Jacobson seems hopeful for Christian growth throughout Asia as they contain 400 million Christians, which is 100 million more than North America, yet only ten percent of their population is christian. This allows room for much expansion in the future. Even though there is room for expansion and Christian populations are overall growing in Asia, Jacobson brings attention to the fact that further growth may cause tensions with government.

The triple dialogue Jacobson references in Asian religion is the Christian theology in Asia to do their best to harmonize civic loyalty, retaining respect for those in other religions, and concern for the poor. This creates a unique form of Christianity. Asian Christians hold a strong faith in civic loyalty and constantly are reminding the majorities in Asia of that. They are constantly looking to achieve and remain having loyalty to Christ while continuing to have solidarity with their non-Christian neighbors and governments. Another thing that differentiates Asia from other Christian populations is Unlike North America, and other western countries it is common for Christians to hold conversations with people of different faiths and show them respect. In their dialogue with those of other religions they are casual, informal, and nonreligious all that matters in their dialogues with other religious groups is representing the gospel in action.

I think the west could learn the interfaith etiquette of those in Asia. Like Jacobson said the west still gets uncomfortable when they converse with those of other religions, and because Christianity is so prominent in North America it is not something that we often have to do. It could be beneficial to learn to communicate with all religious groups and not just learn to live side by side with them but create friendships and treat them the same as those who share your religion.

Team 7 Question 2, 5/3/16

González talks about the intellectual conflict between religion and modern science. This conflict stemmed from the idea that Darwin had proposed: evolution. This idea conflicted with some of the bibles passages about the creation of earth. Beyond that there was a greater challenger being presented about Christianity by studies that were being done in Europe, these studies led to doubts about the validity of most of the bible. Anything that seemed to be magical was declared fiction. This lead to new denominations of Christianity. One of the new denominations was Protestant Liberalism, this was mainly popular in the north eastern states and attempted to fit Christianity into the new intellectual mold. The other main denomination hat came about was an anti-liberalism approach called fundamentalists. This idea was more popular in the southern states where many people saw liberalism as a denial of faith.

Fosdick characterizes the mentality of the fundamentalists and the modernists on the question of “new knowledge” by the separation of the modernists blending the new knowledge and the old faith, and the fundamentalists view that everyone must believe in certain miracles shown through the texts of the bible. Their approaches differ from the bible as fundamentalists deny those the name of being a christian if they do not believe in all that is written in the bible as they believe that everything that has been written has been the work of god. While, the modernists approach of the bible is god revealing his will for the world from the beginning of time up until the end of Christ. Fosdicks solution for resolving this divide is tolerance from the denominations and emphasis on more pressing worldly matters than fighting over denominational issues.

Fosdick envisions modernist Christianity integrating the scriptures with new knowledge, this approach could diminish the bibles authority by contradicting it’s passages. Given the theory of Darwinism as an example, by integrating that the man has evolved through out the years in religion it would contradict with the passages of genesis and the idea that the earth was intended for man. With the continuation and furthering of science this could bring superstition to all the miracles in the bible, which could in turn question the validity of any of the bible being god willed and it would lose it’s importance.

Team 7, Question 3 (4/14)

Ignatius of Loyola was the founder of the concept of “spiritual exercises” these were practices that were meant to prepare ones soul for the transition into heaven. These exercises consisted of prayer, meditation, and other spiritual activities that aimed to “[be] preparing and disposing the soul to rid itself of all inordinate attachments… seeking and finding the will of god.” Ignatius differentiates the “material” and “spiritual”  spheres, thus allowing the possibility of “saving ones soul” by the act of using the things created on this earth to achieve his end for which he is created and remove and cleanse himself in practices such as spiritual exercises of the things that are a hindrance to him. This belief of Loyola leads him to the conclusion that ones desire and choices should be what will let them achieve the end for which one is created.

In Loyola’s “Rules for Thinking with the Church” He is discrediting protestant ideals by siding with catholic tradition. This is seen is his support for confession, mass, relics, and Lent. Loyola writes, “what seems to men white I will believe black if the hierarchical church so defines.”  It is this belief that lead many protestants to have a problem with the church in the first place. This belief shows that unity in church thinking is held very highly in Loyola’s eyes, and is even higher than the right to question how one is interpreting what they are preaching. This belief coincides with the religious unity the catholic church has always desired. The overarching theme in this passage was that the faith and obedience in church officials would lead you to greater religious devotion.

Ignatius of Loyola’s attitudes of the church had become very popular as he seemed to neutralize the ideas of Luther and the reformation church. While Luther and Loyola had both come to realize the justness of god Loyola had gone about it in a way of reaffirming many of the Churches practices such as indulgences, relics, and so on. I think that his beliefs were so popular because his emphasis was on all the ways that you can deepen your relationship with god and cleanse your soul through spiritual exercises. This practice may have become so popular because of all the missionaries that we’re focused on teaching people about it and because of the reformation they’re may have been many catholic people looking for a new way to worship god but still be practicing the same beliefs.

Skip to toolbar