Runquist Murals

All too often, displays of art are often overlooked by the public eye, and I have come to the realization that works of art displayed on our university’s campus are no exception. I have enjoyed accepting the invitation to look at many works of art around campus, including the Runquist murals, throughout my participation in two Arts & Administration courses. I think it is a valuable ability to look at such an academic-driven place as a source of aesthetic beautifications, offering enhancements of civic beautification, improvement, and identity.

The Works Progress Administration (WPA), as negotiated by the New Deal’s Federal Art Project wished to support this movement of advancing the presence of art in public areas. In addition to this increased exposure, the movement also offered civic improvement by employing many impoverished artists, and it is truly great to be able to see an example of this movement within our campus limits. Improving civility by offering job opportunities to artists like these is a practical way of embracing different economic statuses and uniting all members of a society. As the murals in the Knight Library wish to “encourage ongoing dialogue and exploration” of many historic and present-day issues, their presence is improving the discussions of the public viewers (Maruska, 2013).

Not only does this open discussion serve to improve the society surrounding it, but it also provides an opportunity to enhance civic identity. These murals explore many “notions” from the 1930’s, as well as depictions of “figures and ideas about race and ethnicity” that were valid in the time of the murals’ creation, but may not be considered so accurate anymore (Maruska, 2013). The history of our society is particularly important to the identity that we all share today. Arthur and Albert Runquist explore the development of the realm of art in their piece “Development of the Arts,” which is found in the East stairwell. Within this piece are eight panels, each depicting a different era of artistic advancements – early and late primitive periods, Egyptian period, Greek period, Medieval period, the Renaissance, a period of campus development, and modern art period (Maruska, 2013). The panels include forms of art from cave paintings and pottery to the creation of the human figure and finally, the cinema and radio.

The second mural, “Development of the Sciences,” which is found in the West stairwell, also contains eight panels, reflecting similar time periods as the “Development of the Arts” mural. These panels depict scientific advancements of the following time periods: Stone Age, Iron Age, Early Egyptian, Greek Period, the Renaissance, the Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries, a period of campus development, and a modern period. While exploring the identity of this culture, the artists delineated different forms of scientific advancements, including fire-making and cultivation of foods to Newton’s law of gravity and finally, the gas engine and x-rays (Maruska, 2013). The compilation of these advancements has produced a society that can identify with dramatic scientific drive and intellect. So much of our research is centered on medicine, astronomy, and all other realms of science.

I think many can attest to the idea that placing a greater number of art pieces in publicly available places beautifies an area. Throughout this course, we have focused on defining what is and is not art, and one quality that has been consistent through all readings and other assignments is the quality of art to produce in viewers an aesthetic reaction. Again and again, we see this defining characteristic, and it certainly applies to the two Runquist murals. These two pieces have soft colors and shapes that are easy on the eye and act as a focal point for library-goers. The two murals present an aesthetically pleasing representation of the development of the arts and sciences – two subjects heavily emphasized at our university. In a building full of books, desks, and often times, long faces, the Runquist murals beautify the area and transform it into something more pleasant.

 

Maruska, B. (2013). A Response to the Runquist Murals.  http://blogs.uoregon.edu/runquistmurals/. March 15, 2014.

Week 9 Remix

AADWK9.jpg

Here, is a representation of the qualities and values of an artist. Included in my collage are pictures of the following characteristics:

  • Individual
  • Creative
  • Imaginative
  • Playful
  • Perspective
  • Innovative
  • Experimental
  • Original
  • Inspiration
  • Representative

This list is unique to my own opinions, and I made it to be special to me. I put in the time and efforts to determine which qualities and values I believe are representative of an artist. According to Dissanayake, because of these intentions, my work could be considered art. However special to me this list may be, I do not think it should be considered are. In contrast to Dissanayake, Grey describes art as having to create an aesthetic reaction, and I do not think my piece would necessarily create this for all viewers.

 

Dissanayake, Ellen. (1991). What is art for? In K.C. Caroll (Ed.). Keynote addresses 1991 (NAEA Convention), (p. 15-26). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

Grey, A. (2001). Art as Spiritual Practice. The Mission of Art; 1st Edition. Boston & London: Shambhala.

Art, Games, and Technology Research

Beverly Jones writes, “It is a premise of this paper that old cultural patterns do not die. They may fade or become more evident… Only as part of the general ‘nonexpert’ culture can such patterns contribute significantly to maintenance and/or change” (1990). Her piece has been written to bring to attention the idea that origins, especially those of computer graphics, have been present throughout the medium’s evolution and will continue to do so, but these origins are reinvented each time they are caught by the eye of a “nonexpert.” Jones provides several examples of this theory, one being the gerbil habitat created by MIT. These homes were “experimental computer-controlled environments” created by Professor Nicholas Negroponte. In his SEEK project, the purpose was to “problematize the role of computation in design,” while diminishing the roles of the creators (Vardouli, 2011). In a small box were a couple Mongolian desert gerbils and many small plexiglass blocks. Accompanying these little creatures was a robotic arm that would constantly rearrange the blocks and record the gerbils’ responses to the arrangements. Tracing of the gerbils’ behaviors allowed the machine to determine the “living preferences” of the animals.

In today’s culture, we have produced computer programs to reinvent the realm of hairstyling by allowing people to create a visual of themselves with a new hairdo. An example of this is utilized on the TLC show What Not To Wear, where clients are able to play around with new cuts and colors before actually committing to a style. In today’s society, hair has become a medium for art, where different textures, colors, depths, and styles have been applied and from where professions have been developed. The ability to use a computer to bridge the hairstyle with the human before actually receiving a haircut is a re-inventing of this art form. Programs like this are available on the Internet, and there have even been apps created specifically for this including, Hair MakeOver (Touch Apps 2011). This app appeals to its audience by stating that one can “try on” different hairstyles in less than a minute. For most of these programs, users must first upload a picture of themselves, and then computations are made to determine the outline of the face and to then apply a new hairstyle that fits the face.

 

Sources

Hair MakeOver (2011). Touch Apps. Touch Apps 2010. Retrieved from itunes.apple.com/us/app/hair-makeover-new-hairstyle. March 1, 2015.

Jones, Beverly (1990). Computer Graphics: Effects of Origins, Leonardo: Digital Image – Digital Cinema Supplemental Issue, p. 21-30.

Vardouli, Theodora (2011). Nicholas Negroponte: an interview. openArchitecture(s). October 27, 2011.