MABR cohort perspective: the luxury fashion market

Today, Pamela Herring provides some thoughts about the luxury fashion industry.

I have always had a keen interest in the luxury market, throughout these past few months, my interest in this market has further developed into quite a passion of mine, and has quickly turned into a field that I see myself working in later in life, specifically in the lines of corporate social responsibility.

As someone who is interested in sustainability within the fashion industry, a quote that caused me to do a double take was a statement posted on vox.com, stating that “Burberry brought in $3.6 billion in revenue last year — and destroyed $36.8 million worth of its own merchandise.” (Lieber, Vox 2018) Question 1. Why? Question 2. Again… WHY?? (I hope that you feel my frustration through the screen.)

Though public outrage caused Burberry to abolish this practice, according to the article, numerous brands use this strategy and also destroy their unsold goods, too. Richemont, Nike, Louis Vuitton, Victoria’s Secret, and plenty of other well-known retailers use this same practice to “preserve [their] reputation of exclusivity”.

I do understand where these brands are coming from; if their goods are donated, they could easily be resold for less, and could cause the brand image to potentially decrease in value. However, simultaneously, these iconic, high-value companies are wasting tons of materials only to have them be shredded or burned up. It’s interesting to me that the “top of the food chain” brands are the ones that are seemingly the most wasteful, and makes me wonder what kind of unsustainable practices these brands are doing behind the scenes that perhaps aren’t known to the public.

With all of this being said, I do feel for these luxury brands and resonate with why they partake in these choices. But more so, I firmly believe that all brands have a responsibility to make the right environmental choices, which in this case would be coming up with a plan to either having some sort of second-hand system in place for their goods, or making all of their products to order. Hopefully one day I will be in a position to aid in making these choices for brands such as Burberry, and coming up with a strategy to leave a better environmental imprint within the fashion world.

Cole, Brendan. “Burberry Burns Millions of Dollars of Clothes to Stop Them from Being Sold at Discount Prices.” Newsweek, Newsweek, 19 July 2018,
www.newsweek.com/luxury-brands-prefer-burn-millions-dollars-worth-clothes-over-letting-wrong-1032088.
Jonathan Andrews Follow. “Marketing Plan for Nest Thermostats.” SlideShare, 20 Aug. 2015, www.slideshare.net/JonathanAndrews10/marketing-plan-for-nest-thermostats-51868271.
Wicker, Alden. “We Have No Idea How Bad Fashion Actually Is for the Environment.” Racked, Racked, 15 Mar. 2017, www.racked.com/2017/3/15/14842476/fashion-climate-change-environment-pollution.

Pandemic Lessons part 1

It seems like a lot of pundits are publishing lessons for brands from the pandemic this month. Seems a bit early given that we’re still in the midst of it, but here are a few that I learned today from an Adweek article that focused on changes to luxury purchases.

1. Blogs are back! Many brands are feeling that advertising seems to be tone deaf, and that blogs can be more authentic. Blogs can be one way to provide content that makes people feel better and informs and inspires them.

2. Perceptions of luxury have changed. People have traditionally bought luxury goods as a way to communicate their status to others. In a pandemic, that signaling stopped, and luxury good sales decreased. Now that people are thinking about purchasing luxury again, they seem to be appreciating lower price points. Maybe the ‘break’ from buying a lot of stuff has re-set our minds about the appropriate prices for things?

3. Consumers have become accustomed to ‘waiting’ for products given shortages earlier in the pandemic and with shipping time lags. The value of ‘overnight delivery’ from Amazon and other companies may be diminished.