By Benjamin Smith
May 25, 2021
EUGENE, Ore. — At 2:00 p.m. on May 10, 2021, the University of Oregon was one of the final dominos in a line of universities to tumble in requiring its students and staff to be vaccinated before returning to in-person instruction this fall. “We have concluded that to protect the health and safety of our university community and the communities we serve,” said UO President, Michael Schill, in the announcement, “[we] will require students, faculty, and staff who will be on campus to be vaccinated prior to the start of the fall 2021 academic term.”
This announcement has left many in relief and others in disbelief. Dan Morrison, a senior professor at the School of Journalism and Communications, believes that the mandate is no different than other safety precautions the government has taken in the past. Likening the vaccine requirement to the regulations that the federal government imposed with seatbelts in 1968, Morrison said, “This idea that people can say you have no ethical right to tell me what to do—well, I got news for you, the government does that on a regular basis!” However, some feel that this is a different ballgame.
The current vaccines being produced on mass that are widely available in the United States have been approved under the Emergency Use Authorization Act; not to be confused with FDA approval. Having been vaccinated himself, Alec Sapolin, a senior at the SOJC, feels for those who believe that’s cause for concern. “I will say that it is truly a shame that people are being forced to get a vaccine in fear of being removed from an institution when the vaccine isn’t even FDA approved,” he said in an exchange over instant messaging.
The matter is even more convoluted due to a single word in the UO’s announcement: philosophical. It’s provided in parentheses along with two other non-medical exemptions, “religious” and “other belief.” The ambiguous nature of philosophical and other beliefs has left many wondering if the mandate has any teeth at all. At this time, President Schill’s inbox volume did not allow for comment on the situation.
Looking to define philosophical exemptions, I reached out to James Crosswhite, a professor of rhetoric and philosophy at the UO. “I think it’s deliberately ambiguous, because religious exemptions are recognized,” he said on the subject.
“If there were some disagreements about the processes and procedures or the way they drew conclusions from the knowledge about the vaccine, I guess that could be philosophical belief,” he said from across an all-too-familiar Zoom lobby.
“That’s what I don’t understand and that’s what frustrates me. For me it feels like they were trying to please both sides in this weird way,” said Nika Bartoo-Smith, a third-year journalism student. “They felt pressured to make a stance on vaccines, but they also knew that there were [going to be] people who were not excited about it so that’s why they put this grey area.”
Providing another perspective on the exemptions, Professor Morrison feels it could be financial in nature. “They are desperately trying to figure out ways to get students to come back,” he said, “because the university is a business. They lost so much money this last year. Across the board.”
So as much as it may be to protect the community, it might be driven by the need to get the university operational again to stabilize revenues.
“There’s pressure coming from all directions [and] Schill is doing the best he can as far as I can tell. I still don’t think we’ve quite figured out how to handle this just yet,” Morrison said. “It’s an impossible spot. There’s no easy answer. I’m not even sure there is a right answer.”
Financial or not—deliberately required or not—the mandate has left the community desperately searching for a middle ground. With a nationwide chasm manifesting, Bartoo-Smith feels that a middle ground is achievable if people are just willing to empathize with one another.
“The biggest issue I see is this unwillingness to have a conversation and see each other’s side and have a real conversation,” she said. “We need to do a lot more empathizing with each other because we don’t do enough of that in society. We don’t hear each other’s concerns—valid concerns—on both sides.”
The need for a middle ground is essential—the need for understanding even more so. Flagship universities across the country have been hit hard, with the COVID pandemic eviscerating usually stable and rising revenues. Beyond finances, though, the nation longingly looks towards some semblance of normal, with vaccines being portrayed as a possible route.
“People are mature enough to look at the data, weigh the pros and cons, and make their own decisions,” said Sapolin. Having done so, the UO feels that decision should be clear, but ultimately has left it up to the individual. The impetus is now on us to come to a consensus on how to achieve a middle ground that favors everyone’s beliefs with safety in mind.