Response to Perceptual and physiological responses to Jackson Pollock’s fractals
Image from betanews
Although I had some previous knowledge of fractals and that fractals contributed in some way to the work of Jackson Pollock, I had no idea to what extend this connection had been studied, or any knowledge of its findings.
I am always astounded when I read about how simple the mathematical functions that guide fractal generation are. As such, I found the discussion of how D-value is calculated to be simultaneously illuminating and awe-inspiring.
Of most interest to me, was the discussion that followed the finding that fractals in the 1.3-1.5 range had the most widespread appeal. To me, this seems to point to some concept of balance and moderation present in the universe, and would be very interested in any further exploration of that concept. This paper also introduced me to the field of “neuro-esthetics” which is highly intriguing to me. I have identified in my own life noticeable changes of disposition and a lessening of internal anxiety when viewing stirring, well-composed artworks. The thought had not occurred to me before that it could be possible to qualitatively explain this phenomena.
Finally, I also found the idea that Pollock was more prone to creating complex fractals because he had been exposed to them for so long to be very stirring. This seems to start in the direction of proof that art becomes more enjoyable, specifically complex art, the longer it is viewed. This concept could easily be extended to considerations of why those in the “art world” are interested in artworks that do not captivate the interest of a general public in the same way. The more complex ideas, themes, or emotions presented in this art are perhaps enjoyed more by those in the “art world”simply because they have been exposed to them previously. If this is the case, this would provide impetus for the more widespread placement of complex and contemporary art.
Building on the topic of fractals hidden all around us, here are two discussions of fractals that I have found illuminating and endlessly fascinating.
From TED.com
Errors in Rhythm follow Pattern
Questions for Dr. Taylor
Are there any other current theories for why fractals are more pleasing to view than other patterns?
How aware of this patterning was Jackson Pollock when he created these images?
How will the knowledge that humans prefer images in the D-range of 1.3-1.5 affect current artists?
Is there any way that fractals can be compounded to form a distinctly more complex patterning?