After observing the two murals what I noticed was the lack of diversity within the two murals. The murals show the development of the arts and sciences from the very beginning to where it was left off during the period of time that is was painted. I know it is supposed to represent all the individuals who contributed to the development in some way or another, but what I found interesting is the lack of diversity in the mural itself. I noticed this especially is the panel for the Development of the Sciences, in panel seven and eight it shows a more modern time. Panel seven demonstrates students storing knowledge pushing for discoveries in biology, physics, chemistry, etc but all the students are all Caucasian men, there is no student of color in this panel, or even female students. It is interesting to see that in such a piece of art that no diversity be present. What I find intriguing is a piece of art during the time period that the murals were made to now how diversity is portrayed. A point in the reading that I found refreshing was, “ Today’s public art diversity speaks to America’s diversity- and to the increasing number of American’s who want to their cultural interests represented in the public sphere. “ (Doss, 2006) This represents the change in thought of how many people now take pride of their cultural background and as a public we want to see that more in public art. This notion is important to be able to share one’s culture to people from all around the world. It allows for people to see a small insight into the lives of those cultural beliefs and traditions. Whether you disagree or agree with the notion of diversity in public art there is no argument that cannot be made that says you won’t take anything away from it.
A point in the reading that I found so interesting and really allowed me to see how the artist can interpret his piece of work however he likes because that is his or her interpretation of the event. This for me was the sculpture of George Washington by Horatio Grennough. Horatio depicted George Washington as the Greek God Zeus, wearing a toga and sitting on a classical throne. This sculpture was controversial nonetheless during this time period, but at the end of the day it was Horatio’s personal interpretation of George Washington and no one else’s. “ But his ideas about the look and meaning of public art differed considerably from those of other Americans at the time, and his public memorial shifted from a political setting to a cultural one.” (Doss, 2006) At this time Horatio definitely pushed the envelope of the idea of public art, as mentioned in the reading he was a lucky in that his work survived but many others did not. It is now considered as a scared site and in a way public art, a 18th century public cemetery. “ 18th century public cemetery of thousands of enslaved Africans- a six acre site in what is now lower Manhattan was paved over and forgotten. Not until1991 the burial ground rediscovered and returned to public consciousness as a significant cultural, political, and sacred site. “ (Doss, 2006) This is what public art should do, it showed evoke some emotion and stream of consciousness of past historical events and present events. Public art allows for the importance of issues to be seen and heard. While the murals of the Development of Art and Science are important in the development in history it also demonstrates the lack of diversity in the sciences and art during that time. It is interesting to see the past and present public art that allows seeing the evolution of diversity present.