Through the Olive Trees Women Empowerment

I liked watching “Through the Olive Trees” because it is one of the first films that we have watched that gave women a sort of empowering role. Tahereh was not interested in a boy, Hossein, who was pursuing her throughout the film. She made her lack of interest very apparent and had all of the control in the relationship. Which I found refreshing after watching films like Peeping Tom where women are obviously objectified, Singin’ in the Rain where women characters are under appreciated and given little choice in their own outcomes, and even Sherlock Jr. where the only woman is a prize to be won by either one of two men. But in this film, Tahereh takes control of her own destiny.

Tahereh does not speak to Hossein through the entire film and rejects all of his advances. She will not even look at him. It is implied that this is in part due to the fact that Tahereh is more highly educated than her male pursuer, another form of female empowerment portrayed. But it is also arguable that she is simply uninterested, an emotion that women are rarely given the power to feel in media and film. There is also Ms. Shiva, another strong female character. She was obviously a no-nonsense kind of women who was the real driving force behind the production of the film being made. Without her it seems that very little would have been accomplished and that she was actually basically controlling just about everything even though she was not the director.

I found it interesting that the female characters were so strong in this film, and particularly in contrast with the male characters. It seems that the male and female roles were reversed. Hossein was the character chasing after love and throwing himself at his love interest, a role that is usually portrayed by the ‘obsessive woman’.In contrast to Tahereh who held all the power in the relationship and scorned his advances. Also, the director seemed to be the more nurturing character shoe was helping Hossein try to get his girl. The director was very supportive and seemed to be a motherly/fatherly figure to Hossein. Again, a role that is usually portrayed by a women. This is in contrast to Ms. Shiva, the real power house behind the film and authority figure on and off set.

The fact that this role reversal exists in a film depicting Iranian culture makes it especially empowering and interesting. Iran is a county well known for its cultural oppression of women. That a film would dare to portray the female characters as the more powerful over the men in this culture is controversial. It speaks to the immense progress and change being felt though out society in terms of Universal Women’s rights.

Guido’s Stuggle

8 1/2 was probably my favorite films that we have watched in this class. At first I was not sure how I felt about it and was leaning toward not really liking it. It was very dense and difficult to follow. The characters were difficult to identify with and it was pretty, just, weird. But after further reflection and discussion of the film I began to really appreciate it. Particularly Guido’s character.

I love the use of light and shadows to create beautiful scenes and shots. And the dream sequences, no matter how weird, are creative and extraordinary. I also really enjoyed that two people could have completely different interpretations of the film. But I think what I most enjoyed after thinking about 8 1/2 further was the main character Guido. Guido is a director that is trying to create a film that is truthful and that means something. He is having problems with its completion though and can not seem to figure out exactly what he wants. The pressure is mounting for Guido on all sides and he is cracking beneath it.

I think I really began to appreciate Guido because of his psychological breakdown. It made him relatable and interesting. It made him more than an entitled, cheating, big shot director. Guidos breakdown made him a human going through real turmoil and feeling real stress from which he could not escape no matter how hard he tried. I really connected to this since it is somewhat how I have been feeling this term, my last term before graduating. I sympathize with Guido and understand how difficult making final decisions can be under immense pressure.

It seemed that the class consensus was that Guido was whiny, that he had all of the resources he could ever need and still was doing nothing and complaining about it. This is true, Guido was very privileged and could have done just about anything he wanted with his film. But that is just the problem, he didn’t know what he wanted. A person can have all the resources in the world but if they don’t know what they want and are falling apart internally there is very little chance to make any sort of progress.

8 1/2 gave us the story of a man trying to keep it together in a time when he was obviously crumbling and took us on the journey with him. And I really enjoyed going through Guido’s journey. I was able to feel what he was feeling and in the end, the relief of it all being over. This film restored my faith that no matter how stressful life can get, it will all be ok, everything must come to an end, and it is very possible to come out on top no matter how bleak the situation may seem. For this, I love Guido’s character. In my own time of internal stress and turmoil he delivered the message that I needed to hear. Guido is not a whiny dramatic character, he is a man working through his own problems with self-doubt, confusion, and stress and I think that is a beautiful thing to watch.

The Hero and the Sidekick

Singin’ in the rain harbors one of the most famous and common friendship dichotomies seen in storytelling: the dichotomy between the famous ‘popular’ friend, and the lesser noticed yet still loyal and important ‘sidekick’ friend. This type of friendship really resonated with me because for most of our lives I have felt that my best friend and I have had a relationship like this as well.
To put it into context, Don and Cosmo are best friends. They have grown up together and worked to get to where they are today in show business together. However, Don is in the spotlight, and while Cosmo is there too, he is not as famous or adored as the star of the show, Don. The two remain fast friends but Cosmo plays a supporting role in the friendship while Don seems to take precedence. Throughout the film Cosmo is selfless and a brilliant help to Don putting Don and Don’s career ahead of himself and his own. Don is the beloved hero of the story but upon deeper inspection Cosmo is actually the driving force behind Don’s success. Cosmo celebrates with Don and never displays jealousy when Don gets the girl, the fame, and the adoration. He is a truly loyal friend. This is not to say that Don is not a good friend or that Don is taking advantage of Cosmo. Don remains a great friend to Cosmo and it is doubtful that Cosmo would have gotten to where he is without Don. In this type of friendship dichotomy there is a bold hero and a helpful sidekick. In order for the arrangement to work each must accept their roles and fulfill them while also enjoying and gaining something from the friendship.
Don and Cosmo’s friendship really resonated with me because I too have had a friendship like this with my best friend. In recent years we have become more equal in our partnership but when we were younger, the bold hero/helpful sidekick dichotomy was undeniable. My friend was outgoing and friendly, she had a huge group of friends and was one of the ‘cool kids’ in middle and high school. I however was very shy and introverted. I had very few friends and definitely did not qualify as ‘cool’. Every activity that we did together she was the star, the one that got noticed and adored and I was also included but by association. Like Cosmo, I was still there, just not in the spotlight. I was always behind the scenes, there to support her and guide her when she needed it while forging my own different path for myself. But also like Don and Cosmo we have always been best friends. She is a great friend to me and always has been, much like Cosmo and Don. And even though at times I have been urged to be careful and warned that our relationship is one sided, we are best friends, always have been, and always will be. The people who say these things do not understand a friendship like this. They look at it negatively, as if the sidekick is being taken advantage of and the hero is self-centered. But the key to understanding this dichotomy is to understand and accept that neither person is better or worse in the relationship, simply that both are very different and thus play different roles.