“Navigating the Tavern: Digitally Mediated Connections and Relationship Persistence in Bar Settings”
The Rafalow piece gives us a great look into the world of online dating and media usage in a public setting such as a bar. The researchers find that smartphones are being used as tools not only to locate others that may be interested in the surrounding areas but the mediate interactions as well. Tinder is unique because it works off of location, some of the apps experienced in this paper were also GPS related, Rafalow states that “GPS-enabled smartphone applications provided additional means to find and communicate with people who were nearby,”(Rafalow,34). This was also true for about half of the people I interviewed, the fact that it allows you to see interested people that are in your area as well as decide how large of a range you want (from 5 miles – 35 miles). The application also selects people to show you and swipe through that are likely to have things in common with you. Since the app is connected to your facebook it transfers interests you posted online there onto your profile on Tinder. The app will also tell you if that person you are looking at has any mutual friends. This aspect may be an encouraging factor for users- if they see that someone has mutual friends this may be a lead talking point, getting them more interested than they initially were. Depending on what you wish to use the app for and if you want those you are close with to know you are using it, having mutual friends may deter others away as I found out while speaking with Kailey (who I will mention in depth later on).
This piece also discusses the way in which people use digital media to engage in impression management. “Putting on the “best face” in not just digitally mediated contexts but also in traditional face-to-face interaction mattered for establishing trust and interest between two people,”(Rafalow,36). Here the researchers talk about the importance of maintaining an authentic look. If you used very overly flattering pictures of yourself of ones that portray you in a way that is very different from you in real life, it may be hard to build trust with someone else who does not see the online you in reality. While speaking with Hank as well as three other participants in my research, a frustrating expressed was that sometimes people are not as they seem. This made meeting people in an online space more tricky because as Hank stated “You can’t know if someone smells funny or if they aren’t as attractive as they look on Tinder…” This aspect may make connections more difficult for some and more disappointing when someone isn’t who you thought they were.
This paper relates to my topic in many different ways and provides a first hand account of social media usage in a public setting where people tend to go to meet others. By conducting research in a bar they were able to see how people navigate the online and offline world. Weak ties were also often created and something mentioned in the paper. Many people were able to at least establish a weak tie with another by swapping cell phone information. It is interesting to note however that if someone is not seeking to have further contact with someone they swapped phone numbers with, the interactions can get awkward. For instance in the paper one bar patron by the name of Carlos asked a researcher to get coffee with him and she declined. When she saw him in person at the bar he did not speak with them and refused to make eye contact. Rejecting someone online can definitely make it more uncomfortable when you see them in person for the first time after the fact. One of the students I interviewed who wished to stay anonymous stated that they feel extremely awkward when they see someone they talked to on Tinder but never actually met, in real life. This online exchange affects how people navigate the offline world and can make rejection all that more awkward for those getting turned down. However, for those rejecting it may be easier for them to do it online rather than face to face because they do not have to deal with it in person. Often times I have discovered and experienced myself, it is easier for people to say the more difficult things such as breaking up with someone or turning them down, when you do not have to physically engage with that person.