My Proposed Professionalism Grade

I propose to receive 45/50 points on my professionalism points based on my:
 
Punctuality- I was on time to class and group meetings 90 percent of the time. In some occasions I was a few minutes late to class because I had a class right before it. To my group meetings I arrived early or on time and occasionally arrived a few minutes late.
 
Participation- Ever so often I participated in class discussion but not consistently. I tried to give my input every time I had the opportunity but at times I was too shy.
 
Respect for others- I was constantly respectful and aware of how my actions affected others. I tried to help others often and was extremely good at staying focused and keeping my group focused as well. Sometimes sidebar conversations were needed but I made sure they did not last too long and brought the focus back to the work at hand.
 
Preparation- I tried to always come prepared to class but I will admit I may have missed a reading. I also forgot to upload the final assignments on blackboard on the given date but had the hard copies turned in on time.
 
Initiative and motivation- I took advantage of nearly all of the opportunities to learn. I attended two networking events to obtain information on how to improve our proposal. At the networking event I connected with staff from the career center whom provided my group with evidence to support our proposal.

Final Blog Post

As I stated in my leadership development plan, my goal to advance in my leadership development was to improve on the two practices of leadership I ranked low in which were “inspire a shared vision” and “challenge the process”. I also wanted to improve on my emotional intelligence. This consisted of learning how to recognize and manage my emotions and understand those of my team members. I aimed to be socially aware of the emotions each team member expressed and the effect they could have on our meetings.

 

I successfully improved on challenging the process. In big part it had to do with how comfortable I felt with my team members. The atmosphere we created welcomed ideas and suggestions. As for me, it allowed me to play the role of devil’s advocate, I challenged the process by asking questions for clarification or simply disagreeing and suggesting a new idea. My way of measuring my improvement on challenging the process was through my teammate’s feedback.  In the midterm feedback one of my teammates wrote, “She will speak up and voice her opinion but withdraw when others disagree… She should stand her ground about her position…”  Indeed I was speaking up to challenge the process but it was not making any impact if I withdrew once someone disagreed. My next step was to improve in this aspect, and so I did as proven by one of my teammate’s feedback: “[Cecilia] provided very good insight and direction.” By expressing my opinion and following through I provided direction for my team, creating a shared vision.

 

Inspiring a shared vision was the second area I wanted to work on to improve my leadership development. This practice interwove with challenging the process. As I questioned our proposal and the small details, I made the team vision clear. I also measured my progress in this practice through my teammate’s feedback. In the midterm feedback one teammate suggested: “Inspiring a shared vision by spending more time explaining her stances.”  I needed to explain my ideas, similar to the struggles I faced when challenging the process. My improvement in explaining my ideas was noted when I received the final feedback and a teammate commented on my strength to: “Inspire a shared vision by making sure we were all on track for completing the same desired goal.”

 

My Leadership development plan had two aspects to it, being aware of my personal behavior and taking actions to directly influence people’s participation. Working on my personal behavior worked best for me. I asked questions to improve on the practice of challenging the process and was self-aware of my own emotions. Evidence that this aspect of my leadership development plan worked best for me was reflected on the results of my leadership development plan mentioned above where I improved in most of the areas I aimed to.

 

What did not work so much for me was taking actions to influence others. For example, in my midterm feedback a member wrote, “If I could tell you to improve on anything it would be in inviting other group members to speak in group meetings.” I focused on improving my own weaknesses to improve my leadership and failed to consider the importance my teammates input was on my growth.

 

I still need to work on not only focusing on my personal improvement but incorporating the rest of my team to help me improve. I plan to create some changes to improve my contribution to a team. As I wrote on my final individual critique, “I want to continue working on creativity and innovation by incorporating every team members input.”  I will do this by not being self-centered and focusing on improving my leadership development through my team.

 

Leadership development as explained in the articles and modules appears to be a simple task. Determine what it is you need to improve on, how you will improve it, improve it , and tah dah improvement! However this is not the case. It is not easy to change ones ways and incorporate new ways to improve leadership. Once changes are applied the response from the rest of your team is unpredictable. When I challenged the process I did not know what kind of response I was going to receive from my teammates. At times they liked that I played the role of devil’s advocate but at other times they were not too happy about my doubts and concerns. Applying what is taught in class to the real world is not simple as writing portrays it, but it certainly is a learning process.