Objective:
• Consider the origins of art
• Explore a brief history of Western Art
• Examine multiple perspectives for evaluating art
2) Quiz-I am so regretful that I missed it
Reflection:
In the discussion about what is art for, I realized that I don’t really know art as I thought I am. As I mentioned in my discussion, I used to think that art is quite inaccessible and metaphysical. Art is some kind of ‘high culture’ that is not made accessible for everyday people. However, Ellen’s answer about art as an inherent universal or biological trait of human species and a nature process is truly a mind-blowing one. Her introduction of the history of western art further point out that the development of art is not just about spiritual developments, but also an ideology and an artistic reflection about human development. By understanding art as a biological trait, a notion crucial to human survival, I start to attach art with real life activities more and agree that art is for life’s sake. Ellen’s multiple perspectives in looking at the art history and the purpose of art (first as religious iconography and later become the symbolization of ideology) are definitely very refreshing and well evidenced.
Further more, through reading Ellen’s essay, I gain a better understanding for the origin of art. Art is invented to represent and ensemble life. The viewing of art is an essential part of human experience and art is accessible to everyone, like an invitation.
Future:
In the future, I would be aiming to not only look at art, but fully experience and live in art. For instance, next time, I don’t need to remind myself of art when I am at a high art gallery; I would pay attention to all those adorable natural traits around me and see art in them.
Reference:
Dissanayake, E. (1991). What is art for? In K. C. Caroll (Ed.). Keynote adresses 1991 (NAEA Convention), (pp.15-26). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.