Sanitation Infrastructure and Class Disparity in The Industrial Revolution

 

 

Figure 1: Factories running in London

The Industrial Revolution era of the 18th and 19th century led to the start of the technological boom in England which allowed for the nation’s population to grow with the advancement of farming and manufactured goods. In response to this boom, urban centers developed overcrowding issues that caused pollution and class disparity. To address the pollution and the problems that occurred due to unmanaged waste, reforms on sanitation infrastructure were developed.

 

 

Class Disparity in Cities

 

A larger divide in social class inequality followed the sanitation reform due to wealthier parts of the cities benefiting from the innovations while the poor parts still relied on the outdated systems that were initially in place. Due to the fact that the poor people, in this case the working class, still relied on the outdated sanitation systems, disease and pollution from human waste created poor living conditions.

Although the sanitation reforms that were established for 18th century England were put in place to address the issues with waste management that were causing disease, rural and working class neighborhoods of London’s infrastructure were not as developed which created a social inequality between the wealthy and working class.

Figure 2: Overcrowded dwellings in London

Figure 3: Busy streets in the city

Figure: 4 Drainage from homes leading in to the river 

First Solutions and Pollution

Pollution increased as new innovations for toilets emerged, since most solutions involved flushing waste into the rivers. A prominent example was that the government pushed the use of public privies that were built on bridges since the river would wash away the waste. Privies were essentially a hole in the ground with a wooden seat right above it (Jorgensen). They were an effective way of managing human waste when a small number of people used them. The reason behind this was that waste was given the opportunity to decompose which in turn could be used as fertilizer. When a large number of people used the privies, the waste was not given the time to decompose which then caused the holes to fill with waste and cause foul odor (Goodman). This method of dealing with waste led to contamination of water and it only increased with the replacement of privies and the creation of water closets. Water closets were created in an attempt to manage the odors coming from the excrement. They consisted of a cistern that held water, the seat and a vessel with a sluice. The water closets created a variety of issues such as inadequate draining and rapid filling of the cesspits. As the construction of these water closets were expensive, they were not readily available to the working class. Working class families shared public privies. Later on, through the Metropolitan Sanitary Commission, domestic sewer lines were created and led to the Thames River.

Public privies caused contamination to water systems when the waste in the holes leaked out and seeped into the water systems. For example, the waste would seep into wells. Another form of contamination was cesspools being emptied into the rivers. Some parts of London had public privies constructed over bridges in efforts to wash away the waste. By directly emptying waste into the river, people became ill from using the contaminated water.

J.W. Bazalgette proposed a system of sewage lines and pumping stations to address the sanitation conditions and the cholera outbreaks. There were to be four large pumping stations constructed in the north, east, south, and west suburbs of London which would have underground sewer lines run through (Bazalgette). These lines ran on both sides of the Thames River. Since the lines were in the metropolis, this left the rural areas and a lot of the working-class neighborhoods without the new systems.

Although many things were more affordable for the middle class during the Industrial Revolution, the working class’s living conditions were quite poor. There were issues of overcrowding in not just the neighborhoods, but in the households as well (Solomon). In one household, there could be up to three families living together.

In addition, these households had inadequate water supply. Street taps would supply a limited amount of water to up to 30 households. For example, one street tap for the 30 households would sell for an hour a day and only a few times per week (Solomon). Furthermore, water wasn’t the only issue the working class had to live through during these times. In the households that did have water closets and sewer connection, the drainage was inadequate. The water closets would be located in the cellars and in many cases, they would overflow or leak. Since the homes in the neighborhood would share a wall, the occupants would find their cellars flooded with excrement from the other household if it leaked (Wright).

The occupants of these neighborhoods suffered from higher fatality rates than the others. They were affected by chronic illnesses, shortened life spans, and a high infant mortality rate in which 15 out of 100 infants died within a year of birth (Solomon).

One of the illnesses that took countless lives was cholera. It spread through contamination of water by leaky sewers that fed into wells and rivers. Since water was pumped from the rivers to provide drinking, cleaning, and cooking, neighborhoods near the contaminated pumps suffered high fatalities from the cholera bacteria (Solomon). Cholera could be identified by the symptoms the victim would develop. Intense diarrhea, cramps, vomiting, and fevers were a few that the victim would demonstrate. The most intense part of the illness was the rapturing capillaries that resulted in death (Solomon).

Figure 5: Under ground sewer line
Figure 6: Wentworth St. and the families that live there

Final Take Away

The Industrial revolution period was filled with great advancement and opportunity, but when looking at the living conditions of the working class in urban and rural areas, class disparity occurred. Inadequate living conditions such as overcrowding, poor drainage, limited water, and pollution caused the working class to suffer higher mortality rates. To address the problems that occurred due to these issues, reforms on sanitation infrastructure were developed.

Bibliography

“Letter of Mr. J.W. Bazalgette on Establishment of Public Conveniences throughout the Metropolis : Printed by Order of Court, 22nd March, 1849 : London (England). Metropolitan Commission of Sewers : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming.” Internet Archive. [London] : Printed by Reynell and Weight, 16 Little Pulteney Street, 01 Jan. 1970. Web. 08 Mar. 2021.

Jorgensen, Dolly. The Metamorphosis of Ajax, jakes, and early modern urban sanitation. Early English Studies. Vol. 3. 2010

Wright. “Clean and Decent : The Fascinating History of the Bathroom & the Water Closet and of Sundry Habits, Fashions & Accessories of the Toilet Principally in Great …” Web. 08 Mar. 2021.

Solomon, Steven. “Water: The Epic Struggle for Wealth, Power, and Civilization.” Water: The Epic Struggle for Wealth, Power, and Civilization. New York: Harper Perennial, 2011. 249-66. Print.

Image source

Figure 1: https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/smokestacks-of-industrial-revolution.jpg?w=720

Figure 2: Wright. “Clean and Decent : The Fascinating History of the Bathroom & the Water Closet and of Sundry Habits, Fashions & Accessories of the Toilet Principally in Great …” Web. 08 Mar. 2021.

Figure 3: https://spartacus-educational.com/DIScholera.htm

Figure 4: Wright. “Clean and Decent : The Fascinating History of the Bathroom & the Water Closet and of Sundry Habits, Fashions & Accessories of the Toilet Principally in Great …” Web. 08 Mar. 2021.

Figure 5: http://www.hevac-heritage.org/built_environment/pioneers_revisited/surnames_a-o/bazalgette.pdf

Figure 6: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wentworth_st,_Whitechapel_Wellcome_L0000878.jpg