From Pushkin to Pravda: Russia and the Caucasus Through Popular Media

Presenter: Maryam Moghaddami – Cinema Studies

Faculty Mentor(s): Susanna Lim

Session: (In-Person) Poster Presentation

On October 4, 2021, somewhere between Izmailovskaya station and Pervomayskaya station, a fight occurred and resulted in the severe beating and consequent hospitalization of a man by his three adversaries. This story might have been entirely overlooked had it not been for the ethnicity of the men involved which turned into a nationwide sensation. The three men, Dagestanis, severely injured an ethnic Russian male whose only provocation turned out to be his defense of a woman who the three men were harassing.

This paper seeks to examine the depiction of this incident in Russian mass media and discuss its relation to perceptions of identity and nation. In order to do so, this paper will begin by closely reading the depiction of the Circassian male, arguably the 19th century’s de facto “Caucasian male” or “kavkazets” in Alexander Pushkin’s “A Prisoner in the Caucasus.” Pushkin’s work is also notable in its formulation of the Russian identity through its designation of the “kavkazets” as being the “Other.”

This paper will look at the descriptions of this incident and contrast the characteristics assigned by Pushkin and those touched upon by the media covering the incident. Additionally, the paper will emphasize the idea of the “Russian” and the “other” and show how this distinction is emphasized through geography. With the current high in Russian nationalism, the impact of this incident will also be discussed in relation to Russian identity.

Consequences of Conduct: A Character Analysis of Anna Karenina

Charlotte Rheingold (Comparative Literature, Economics)

Mentor: Susanna Lim

Oral Presentation

Panel B: “Character Creation” Oak Room

Concurrent Session 1: 9:00-10:15am

Facilitator: Matt Nelson

Although she is no role model to be emulated, readers have been enchanted by the character of Anna Karenina for generations. Her alluring personality and passionate individualism obscure her true nature— that of an adulteress who ultimately abandons her family. For Tolstoy, family represented the most sacred of relationships, yet he too is charmed by Anna despite her violation of his own ideal. How can one of literature’s most well-loved characters also be one of the most selfish and reckless? The answer lies in the fact that her personality abstracts her conduct and makes the reader willing to overlook her self-serving decisions. I will argue that Anna’s conduct is what ultimately leads to her downfall, and not her personality, because the same tendency to flout societal regulations is also seen in the morally upright character, Levin. I will reveal through a series of close readings and secondary sources that Anna’s faults lie in the nature of how she executes her decisions, not the decisions themselves, like having an affair, which Russian high society did not entirely frown upon.