Presenter: Megan Brogan
Mentor: Ronald Mitchell
AM Poster Presentation
Poster 5
Do large dam projects create a “sustainable improvement of human welfare” for those directly affected by a dam (WCD 2000, 2)? Scholars have failed to address whether a community suffering from economic hardship would benefit from the construction of a dam, or if there are better means of human welfare development. To determine whether a dam should be built, one must consider the counterfactual: what the community would be like in terms of economic stability, social equality, and environmental sustainability without a dam. This thesis argues that although there may be benefits of leaving a river to run its natural course, the economic gains associated with the implementation of a large hydropower dam bring a greater “sustainable improvement of human welfare” to the community in question (WCD 2000, 2). Despite environmental changes and economic obstacles associated with the Yacyretá Dam, over time, the people that depend on the Paraná River have experienced sustainable development. The initial benefits of allowing a river to run its natural course are the forgone opportunity costs that would be associated with the construction of a dam, such as dam-related downstream and upstream flooding, environmental changes due to the impoundment of the river, construction-induced human displacement, and the overall financial burden of constructing a large dam and funding its operation. However, economic ben- efits such as job growth and and access to electricity have the potential to outweigh these environmental costs.