Presenter(s): Marie-Rose Tonguino—Economics
Faculty Mentor(s): Bill Harbaugh
Session 2: Oregon Trails
Student evaluations of instructors are widely used in higher education to measure the quality of teaching of professors and instructors . Yet, recent research suggests that these evaluations are often biased, especially toward women and ethinic minorities, and that they do not necessarily provide an accurate measure of teaching quality . Research has found that some instructors tend to teach to the test in order to improve student performance on standardized tests, therefore omitting important skills that students need as they further their education . Other instructors have also been found to have bad evaluations and yet appear to be the ones who better prepare students for subsequent classes than their counterparts . For this reason, some researchers have been looking at value added and continuation rates to measure teaching quality, as opposed to measuring instructor quality solely using student evaluations and student performance on standardized tests . Value added is a method of measuring teaching quality through evaluating a student’s performance in a subsequent course compared to their counterparts, after taking the first course from different instructors . Continuation rate is a measure of the percentage of an instructor’s students who go on to take a subsequent related course . This research paper focuses on value added and continuation rate methods to measure instructor quality using University of Oregon data, as opposed to using student evaluations of instructors .