Tag: Global Views—We vs. Them

Enhancing Education through Improved Communication: Case Study of Senegal

Presenter(s): Dylan Land—International Studies, Political Science

Faculty Mentor(s): Dennis Galvan

Session 1: Global Views—We vs. Them

Education is understood as a cornerstone of any development endeavor . Improved education has empirically proven to ameliorate health outcomes, bolster social and economic mobility, amplify civic participation and lay the foundation for other positive societal developments . The education system in Senegal has continued to improve through various initiatives, sponsored by the national government and the donor community . Despite the success of various reform programs, there is still much to be done in order for Senegal to meet desired benchmarks established by national, regional and global education expectations . At the core of Senegal’s educational shortcomings lies ineffective communication . There is a lack of consistent empirical data about the achievements of education initiatives . There are holes in reporting and monitoring mechanisms, and the complexity of results-based frameworks often produces inefficiency within the system, all of which, I contend, could be solved through improved communication . Grounded in expansive literature review and analysis of primary source documents, this paper will explore possible avenues for enhancing education in Senegal . Through the formation of robust communication channels, coherent systems of accountability, and transparent mechanisms for administrating, reporting and monitoring, educational deficiencies could be remedied . However, considering the significant absence of reliable and consistent data, further research is required to determine the exact measures that must be taken by relevant stakeholders . Understanding the possibilities of improving the Senegalese education system may teach us important lessons about how to further enhance education internationally and prepare students in all nations for meaningful participation in the modern world .

Uneven Citizenship: Post-September 11th Immigration Enforcement and Separation of Arab, Middle Eastern, and Muslim Families

Presenter(s): Raimy Khalife-Hamdan—International Relations, Romance Languages

Faculty Mentor(s): Tobin Hansen

Session 1: Global Views—We vs. Them

The shocking September 11th terrorist attacks prompted an immediate and drastic response from the US government . More than 1,200 Middle Eastern, Arab, or Muslim noncitizen adults were immediately detained and deported within two months . What were the social effects on their US citizen children? And what do these impacts reveal about the unevenness of US citizenship? Drawing from anthropological research on Latinx family separation in the US, this research examines the harmful impacts on children’s physiological, developmental, and psychological health associated with family disruption and speculates about the fallout of family separation immediately following 9/11 . These US citizen children, now adults, were active agents within their transforming family structures while also being subject to the racialization and criminalization inherent in the violent mechanisms of immigration enforcement . Since citizen children of mixed status families are implicated and indirectly punished for their families’ precarious legal statuses, citizenship is not a determinative assurance of protection, but one mediator of experience along with other social factors and identities . Most importantly, the harmful impacts of family separation on both citizen and non-citizen children alike suggest the need for the US government to adopt more humane immigration enforcement practices and valorize family units as well as all children’s health, development, and wellbeing .

Lebanon, the European Neighborhood Policy, and the Syrian Refugee Crisis: A Lebanese equation for EU national security?

Presenter(s): Raimy Khalife-Hamdan—International Relations, Romance Languages

Session 1: Global Views—We vs. Them

Formerly considered the Paris of the Middle East, Beirut once displayed her millennium-old ties to Europe through architectural glory, refined cuisine, and French schools, which were commodified proof of the 1923–46 French Mandate’s influence on Lebanese society . Now, Europe reclaims its leverage over Lebanon through EU institutions, particularly the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) . Evident in European Commission documents and social scientists’ research, the EU-Lebanese relationship is asymmetric, especially as Lebanon struggles to absorb over one-and-a-half million Syrian refugees in a population of six million Lebanese . While glamorizing the ENP as a development- inducing instrument that provides aid to the Lebanese community in exchange for economic liberalization and state democratization, the EU utilizes the ENP as a facade of benevolence in order to promote reforms that nurture Europe’s own regional security agenda .

Furthermore, just as the implementation of the ENP is politically-serving, the EU treats the ongoing Syrian refugee crisis as an opportunity to advance its own interests in Lebanon by enforcing refugee containment mechanisms to avoid Europe’s destabilization . As the Syrian refugee crisis worsens, Lebanese debt accrues, and Lebanese civilians are frantic over increasing unemployment, Lebanon has become dangerously reliant upon the ENP . The more Lebanon relies on EU aid, the more likely it will be to submit to reform and lose its political autonomy . Unfortunately, Lebanon seems to lack any other choice .