Presenter(s): William O’Brien—Philosophy
Faculty Mentor(s): Steven Brence
Session 3: Beyond a Melody
In this paper, I critically examine our human capacity for abstraction . I examine this tool in the pragmatic terms of John Dewey, wherein abstraction is understood as our human capacity used to successfully engage in our environment and achieve our interests and purposes . Specifically in the context of John Dewey’s reflective thought, I critically examine abstraction’s process and purpose . From this examination, the essential role that the tool of abstraction plays comes to light . It is seen that abstraction is necessary for reflective thought to function, and without it, this personally familiar process would cease to be . After showing abstraction’s essential role in this familiar context, I get into explaining problematic aspects of reflective thought’s logical understanding of abstraction . This understanding of abstraction has been the basis upon which reflective thought may produce logical results that are problematically ‘out of touch’ and biased . I take up the ‘reasonable woman standard’ in law to illustrate a concrete example of this . Ultimately, I conclude that for reflective thought we still need the same logical understanding of abstraction, but only insofar as it serves as a basis for a new logical understanding, wherein we must always ask and consider the question of who, in order to avoid logical results that are problematically exclusive and biased .