speranza@uoregon.eduOctober 10, 2021 at 10:51 pm · Reply →
Good. I know you are moving along.
Try to focus on line drawings to start. The sections you have moving are great start but could be stronger if you think of them as comparative. I would tie them to the “data” and types of data mentioned such as the water, light, humidity, pollination needs – how else can you create a chart or databased of the needs of each tree – a comparison? giving icons to each. Hint is that this is your theoretical framework.
eventually you can back to air quality. Maggie.
In barcelona we had landscape architecture students who could measure the stunted health of trees based on color, state and size of trees…ratio of canopy size, height, etc.
Can you find the pollution tolerance of these trees? flood? drought?
Im not implying that you propose the elimination of such species but rather engage the resilient aspects into your design.
Good. I know you are moving along.
Try to focus on line drawings to start. The sections you have moving are great start but could be stronger if you think of them as comparative. I would tie them to the “data” and types of data mentioned such as the water, light, humidity, pollination needs – how else can you create a chart or databased of the needs of each tree – a comparison? giving icons to each. Hint is that this is your theoretical framework.
eventually you can back to air quality. Maggie.
In barcelona we had landscape architecture students who could measure the stunted health of trees based on color, state and size of trees…ratio of canopy size, height, etc.
Can you find the pollution tolerance of these trees? flood? drought?
Im not implying that you propose the elimination of such species but rather engage the resilient aspects into your design.