ARH 607 Digital Art History

Maps Scholarly DH Project Reviews

| 3 Comments

Digital Harlem

Three members of the Arts eResearch Unit at the University of Sydney built the structure of Digital Harlem, a project built on the research of four historians in the university’s Department of History. The Australian Research Council Discovery Grant, University of Sydney-Sesqui Research and Development Grant helped fund this interactive digital project.

Using information from legal records, newspapers, archival and published sources, the digital map project documents the events, inhabitants, and buildings of the Harlem neighborhood in New York City from 1915-1930. The creators state that by using records that document the everyday lives of lower-class individuals, this project diverges from standard scholarship on Harlem’s middle class individuals and artists. In combining Google Maps with the website’s database with recorded events, one can see the development of businesses at specific addresses and the spatial relationships between the events and locations of people’s lives. However, by limiting the database to secondary sources, Digital Harlem loses valuable information from the personal accounts of Harlem’s residents.

One can choose filters based on “Events” (ex. Weddings or Robberies), “People”, and “Places” (by street address or type of building, i.e. Bank or Church), and create layers to answer personalized research questions about the social geography of early 20th century Harlem. For example, if one asks “From 1920-1925, were speakeasies located far away from police stations?” one can create layers based on time and type of location, and Digital Harlem will display all of the points and documents related to the inquiry on the Google Maps box. However, one cannot see digital copies of the documents listed in a location’s tab, limiting the access and publishing to those who have worked on Digital Harlem itself.

One can also click on a data point to see which individuals, businesses, and events were associated with a particular address from 1915-1930. While the Events and Places tabs do not require prior knowledge of an event or place, the People tab does not function. Even if one knows the name of a specific individual mentioned in a previous record, Digital Harlem will not generate any records. Links under the “Featured Section” redirects to an external WordPress article on a specific subject (i.e. Harlem Hospitals) with historic photographs and a customized Google Map with filters related to the subject. However, not all of the links to customized Google Maps work, but the ones that do redirect users to the Digital Harlem website allows one to add additional filters, prompting further research questions.

Screenshot (487)

GhostMetropolis- A Featured Collection of HyperCities

Part of the larger HyperCities project created by University of California Los Angeles professors Todd Presner, David Shepard, and Yoh Kawano, GhostMetropolis answers how primary sources and maps can help in understanding the history of cities and human geographies. The three professors have created projects, but anyone can build a new HyperCity project that answers an individual question. Users can incorporate media such as Google Earth, Picassa picture viewer, YouTube, Twitter, Vimeo Video Player, which give users a clearer understanding of how geography and social environments impacts lifestyles. If one needs help in creating his or her own project, the “HyperCities Construction Kit”, “FAQ”, and “HyperCities Source Code” pages can help.

However, if one cannot install Google Maps because one is using a public computer (i.e. a library computer) or the computer does not have a supported browser (Safari, Chrome, and Firefox), then the website has little available content. In opening the GhostMetropolis homepage, it displays a grid list of all the projects, which focus on cities such as Fukushima, Japan, Los Angeles, and Rome. Clicking on a project title will commence the path, which encourages visitors to explore and experiment with the multimedia layout. The “Map Library” option overlays historic maps on a larger digital map which one can easily toggle on/off.

GhostMetropolis has several shortcomings. The grid interface on the first place is not easy to navigate, especially if one wants to find a specific page or project. Additionally, Presner, Shepard, and Kawano do not give information on the funding of the project, nor does the layout of the website allow one to easily cite or link to external bibliographical sources. However, due to the collaborative nature of the larger HyperCities project, the original authors or contributors can devise methods and tools to improve the site’s bibliographic weaknesses.

Screenshot (488)

T-RACES (Testbed for the Redlining Archives of California’s Exclusionary Sapces)

T-RACES claims on its website to be one of the first digital “‘humanities grids’”. Authored by Richard Marciano (University of Maryland), Chien-Yi Hou, and David Goldberg (Director of University of California Humanities Research Institute), T-RACES has interactive maps and preserves documents about the redlining process under the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) as part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal. The project investigates the process behind redlining and how it had/has an impact on racial-economic discrimination and access in California and North Carolina college cities. However, the demo only gives access to two North Carolina cities as opposed to eight in California.

The T-RACES homepage provides links to all of the project’s pages, but one may have difficulty in discovering the information about the project located in the “Regional Networks” button at the bottom of the page. From the Homepage, the “Regional Redlining”, “Color Codes”, “National Redlining”, “Before HOLC”, “About HOLC”, and “Beyond HOLC” pages provide historical and socio-economic context on the redlining process using maps and excerpts from government documents. The “About Us” page lists contributors and “References” provides links to articles that mention the T-RACES project. The “News” tab is the only location on the website that provides information about funding; an article about a IMLS grant that the project received.

The highlight of the website, the “Demo” page provides interactive Google Maps of the color-coded “security areas” maps used to divide cities into districts. A University of North Carolina-developed data grid (central catalog) and HASS (Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences Grid) infrastructures by the UC Humanities Research Institute provide the backbone of the Google Maps, in which one can view security area and specific districts all at once or selectively. One can toggle layers on and off to see the social-geographic connections between areas and how divisions in the 1930s affected districts visible on the Google Map of present cities. The “Tools” section has a variety of bibliographic material, including documents on redlining, the KMC file for export, and a query tool to search the documents. While the T-RACES demo currently does not support scholarship outside of the academic sphere, the project can grow and support more cities.

Screenshot (489)

 

Holocaust Geographies Collaborative-Mapping Mobility in the Budapest Ghetto and Arrests of Italian Jews 1943-1945

The Holocaust Geographies Collaborative, headed by Waitman Beorn, Alberto Giordano, Simone Gigliotti, Tim Cole, Anna Holian, Anne Knowles, and Paul Jascot as part of the Stanford University Spatial History Project investigates how understanding space, geography, scale, and location impacted the development and consequences of the Holocaust. In particular, maps and timelines demonstrate how the Holocaust was a spatial phenomenon. The Spatial History Project of Stanford, funded by the Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education, Andrew M. Mellon Foundation, Wallenberg Foundation Media Places Initiative provided funding to the project, information that the authors list at the bottom of its homepage. However, the Holocaust Geographies Collaborative project does not permit editing, scholarship, or projects outside of the project.

The “Mapping Mobility in the Buddhist Ghetto” feature uses an introductory video, digital map, voiceover narration, and drag-able animations to map the foot-traffic activity on a specific day within a Jewish ghetto. It strives to answer how the city plan and curfews impacted the movement of Budapest Jews, Nazis, and bystanders. The accompanying narration adds another layer of understanding, which one could not grasp from the map alone. Layers that one can toggle on/off to show landmarks, change the time of day, and adjust the speed permit one to interact with the map in the way one prefers. However, the text accompanying the map does not provide footnotes nor bibliographic material, which limits users’ access to learning outside of the project.

Screenshot (495)

The “Arrests of Italian Jews”, 1943-1945 documents the dispersal patterns of the arrests of Italian Jews during the Holocaust with an interactive map. Users can manipulate sliders to select ranges of time and dates, which appears in dots on the map above. When one hovers over a specific region, the scatterplot and several bar graphs on the right side record distances and demographics of the arrested persons based on a particular time frame and location. The sliders are a bit difficult to manipulate and users may have a difficult time creating meaning from the scatterplot. However, the map in the top left corner, with color-coordinated circles, better illustrates the variable of distance from where the arrest occurred to the person’s last residence.

Screenshot (494)

 

 

3 Comments

  1. In looking at the webpage for Digital Harlem I found the site to be user friendly, with clear instructions that make searching relatively easy, if your computer or browser is compatible. I agree with Rachel’s assessment that the site loses some potential by not including images of the primary documents this data was mined from and not taking advantage of first person accounts. I do also wonder if using primary archived printed materials means that certain events or people are over reported. For example weddings may or may not have paper announcements but it is likely all arrests would have preserved paper trails, what are the limitations of the metadata this project has to work with?

  2. Great analyses, Rachel! I thought all of your comments were helpful, and the inclusion of screen shots was a great detail.

    Digital Harlem:
    What did you think about the event search in the map? Would the site designers benefit from separating events like robbery and assault from things like basketball games and billiards matches? I realize that they were attempting to encompass the lives of all “ordinary African New Yorkers.” Yet, according to their “About” section, their primary sources are legal records, so that must bias their results. What do you think about this?

    GhostMetropolis:
    I thought your review was extremely helpful. I also found the site difficult to navigate, and your review actually helped me understand the purpose of the site better than the site itself. Anyone browsing for information might benefit from the grid layout, but those looking for specific information will have a hard time with this site. Their navigation bar on the left is similarly unhelpful in directing users to specific content.

    T-RACES
    Are the designers planning on adding more cities to the demo? I was able to access the California cities as well as North Carolina’s, but I’m wondering why they refer to it as a demo page as opposed to a full feature of the website. Is this project not entirely online or just incomplete? Do you know when it was last updated? I agree with your review in that the site is lacking in information about the project. The few paragraphs in “Regional Networks” do not really help answer many questions about the website.

    Holocaust Geographies Collaborative:
    I thought this was a great website. It was very comprehensive and the designers appear to be very sensitive to the nature of the topic they are handling. As such, I understand why they would not want to allow any editing or scholarship from outside of the collaborative. This limits their project, however. What do you think about this issue? Would it be worth it to allow outside contributors as long as they participated in a review process or does that just complicate the goal of the project?

  3. These projects all demonstrate incredibly useful avenues for visualizing data that might otherwise remain abstract. However, in class we have discussed that one of the major advantages (and in some instances pitfalls) in Digital Humanities projects is the fact that many individuals can contribute information and interpretations. These projects, however, seem to all be put forth by an institution and the users are not capable of adding to them. While this seems to be a given for some of the projects (because they are complex maps created by experts), others I feel could benefit by being added to by users. For example, the Digital Harlem project chronicles events in 1915-1930’s Harlem that can then be searched by keyword, date, and location. Could this project not contribute a more accurate image of life in Harlem if it included information from those who lived there (or their descendents)? Likewise, projects such as “Mapping Mobility in the Budapest Ghetto” might be further enriched if they included personal accounts or descriptions of the conditions in the Budapest Ghetto.

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.


Skip to toolbar