RoJ: 5/10 Question 1 by Group 3

In Mk 1:21 – 3:6 Mark portrays Jesus as someone who has authority but “not as the scribes”, someone who commands unclean spirits and they obey him, some who heals the sick, paralytic, and leper, someone who has authority to forgive people of their sins, and as someone in command of the Sabbath. Mark even paints him calling people who are hated members of the community like Levi the tax collector. Also Mark connects Jesus to King David when he tells the story of Jesus telling the Pharisees that King David fed his people similar to what he’s doing now. The crowds seem to be fascinated by Jesus and his healings and follow him around wherever as suggested by “people came to him from every quarter” (Mk 1:45). His early disciples just blindly followed him with not much thought when Jesus said “follow me” and Levi “got up and followed him” so simply. And lastly the leaders like the scribes and Pharisees didn’t seem excited about Jesus and his ministry. They would question his decision to eat with the tax collectors, his fasting and Sabbath practices. They questioned his authority to forgive, calling it a “blasphemy”. And ultimately they had hardness of heart and “conspired with Herodians . . . to destroy him” The words and deeds of Jesus are consistent aretological devices that argue for his divinity. And the Good News or Gospel, of the Kingdom of God that Mark presents doesn’t seem to be in line with the Jewish leaders at the time. The kingdom of God and the good news is for the sick, sinful, hated, and is something that requires “new wine skin” so that you may acquire it and the Jewish leaders weren’t happy about this.

The motif of secrecy and Jesus as source of misunderstanding is evident in the passage found in Mark 4:1-34. The soils of the parable even highlight the secrecy of his ministry and the reason why people will “look but not perceive and . . . listen but not understand” his parables. The path, rocky ground, thorns and the good soil represent the different types of people who will hear this words or see his teachings and not understand or perceive it. The parable highlights that only the good soil will bear fruit and increase the yield, and I liken the good soil as those who do understand. The mission is to proclaim the good news at any cost. Those who don’t take hold are simply people who heard the call but didn’t bear fruit for various reasons. Those that hear the word and proclaim the good news despite the cost, which in John the Baptist’s case is arrest” are those who landed on good soil and bore 30, 60, and even 100 fold. This message was crucial for the context in which Mark was writing too. After the fall of the temple and the rise of the early Christian persecution many were falling away because of fear i.e. thorny/rocky soil. Mark is charging the early Christians to take root and be good soil and to multiply. The mission is to proclaim the Good News despite the turmoil they face. The following seed parable even highlights this, the obedience of a single person aka mustard seed, will grow to be the branches on which birds nest on. The image of a promise of harvest was hope for the early Christians at the time.

Team 3: Question 2

The practice of apotheosis, or to deify and have someone ascend to the heavenss, was developed from Ancient Mesopotamia. The most notable of which is the apotheosis of Hadrian’s wife Sabina. White is saying that the early Christian’s apotheosis-like retelling of Jesus has its origins from the Greek practice and even gives context to the concept “gospel”. When Octavian defeated Antony and Cleopatra he was given the title Augustus which literally means “hallowed” or “revered”. And to add to that White says a temple was erected in honor of his conquest and the he brought “good tidings” along with his reign. This concept of “euangelion” or “gospel” was used by early Christians to announce Jesus’ reign, and in tandem with apotheosis language regarding his ascent to the heavens, it solidified his image as the divine being that has come to save the Jews and gentiles from the world.

The story of Romulus by Livy’s account, or his death rather, was a typical apothecial narration. A sudden storm that claimed the life of a king and reappearance after his departure to his “fellow citizen” to proclaim that Rome be the capital of the world. The primary purpose of this story is to reinforce the power and authority of Rome. The varying views of later emperors such as Claudius had mixed results regarding how they were taken. While some stood by the deification of Roman the emperors, even if Claudius rule was ridiculed due to his modern day equivalence of cerebral palsy, others like Seneca just mocked the entire practice by telling the satirical story of Claudius’ encounter with the God’s in heavens and how he was eventually banished from the heavens. These varying acceptance of the divinization is telling of the nature of Roman’s empire. And that in some places these stories were more likely to have been accepted than in more Roman areas.

These stories seemed to have more influence in Greek areas because of the backdrop and history of the people. Their mythological beliefs lends itself to accepting these stories more openly than other places. Temples were built in the names of the deified emperors and it served the syncretized religions effectively. The pragmatic purpose it serves is simple – happy citizen’s means easier access and control of their land.

The picture painted for the first century reader of Luke Chapter 2:1-14, 25-35 is much clearer for them than modern eyes skimming this passage. First is the kingship relation and tie to the Kind David. It marks a royal lineage that is imperative for an emperor to be exalted or lifted to divine status. Second is the angel appearing to the people saying do not be afraid, because the entrance of a divine being is always marked with angels announcing to people “do not be afraid”. Third is the “good news” or “euangelion”, a rather political statement that an era of good tidings is incoming and again is tied to an arrival of a ruler or an emperor. And last starting at verse 25, is someone claiming Jesus as someone who will be destined for the “falling and the rising of many” and it speaks of someone who will conquer and save people. It seems to be a checklist: savior, extraordinary birth, divinity, messiah, son of God, royal lineage and so on, and all are checked off. Luke is clear in his persuasion, Jesus is all that and he starts off convincing the reader of that with his story.

Skip to toolbar