Raahi Reddy, Daniel Morris, Ellen K. Scott, Bob Bussel and Shauna Dyer, The High Cost of Low Wages
2014
All posts by lroberts
Oregon’s Care Economy
Raahi Reddy, Mary King and Laura Dresser
Oregon’s Care Economy: The Case for Public Care Investment, January 2017
Why do so few American workers have unions? Understanding the anti-union industry.
Unions are one of the key strategies for improving American workers’ standard of living and decreasing inequality. Across the country, if you compare two people who work in the same occupation and same industry, with the same education and experience, but one has a union and the other does not – the person with a union on average makes more than 10% higher wages and has a 20-205% better chance of getting health insurance or a pension through their job.
Simply put, unions enable employees at any job to negotiate with their boss for a fair share of the profits that their work creates – it’s no surprise that people who are able to engage in collective bargaining end up with fairer working conditions.
For this reason, it’s no surprise that many non-union workers wish they had a union in their workplace. The most recent survey data shows that nearly half of all non-union workers say they would vote for a union in their workplace if given a chance. If all these people had their wish come true, there would be an additional 58 million union members in the country, and the crisis of inequality would be dramatically improved.
In reality, however, only 50,000 unorganized workers a year manage to win the right to a union through the National Labor Relations Board. If 58 million people want a union, how can it be that less than 1% of them are able to realize this goal?
The answer to this question can be found in two recent reports published by the Economic Policy Institute, co-authored by LERC professor Gordon Lafer and LERC graduate research assistant Lola Loustaunau. The first report – titled simply Unlawful – reports on the vast industry of “union avoidance” consultants who coach American employers to launch intensive campaigns aimed at stopping their employees from exercising their right to collective bargaining. The report documents that American corporations – including many name-brand companies – spend over $340 million per year to deny their employees the right to organize. In those efforts, these same employers are charged with illegal acts of intimidation or retaliation against their employees in over 40% of cases. (report is here: https://www.epi.org/publication/unlawful-employer-opposition-to-union-election-campaigns/)
The second report, Fear at Work (https://www.epi.org/publication/fear-at-work-how-employers-scare-workers-out-of-unionizing/) shows how, even when they don’t break the law, employers rely on a set of intimidation tactics that would be illegal in any election for city council, state legislature or Congress, but which are permitted under current federal labor law. The report ends with a call for Congress to enact new federal labor law that makes the right to collective bargaining a reality rather than an illusion for American workers.
Most Expensive Ballot Initiative in California History
Most Expensive Ballot Initiative in California History Pits Uber and Lyft Against Drivers Who Built a Union from Scratch
by Brian Dolber
During this election cycle, companies like Uber, Lyft, and Doordash—the so-called “gig economy” giants—spent a record-breaking $200 million backing Proposition 22 in California. The proposition, which passed on Tuesday, will exempt these companies from basic labor law.
While the initiative was opposed by the California Federation of Labor and many Democratic elected officials, its fiercest adversary was a little-known “start-up” union, the 19,000-member Rideshare Drivers United. RDU emerged out of grassroots protests in August 2017 against the lower-than-minimum wage paid by Uber and Lyft to drivers at LAX Airport.
Solidarity Matters
If ever there was a time for solidarity, this is it! Our thoughts go out to the workers on the front lines, especially those in health care, retail, education, and the public sector who are putting themselves on the line for our safety. And we empathize with those of us who are facing work slow downs and layoffs and sacrificing more than they should have to address this health and social challenge. We are grateful that many of these workers have strong unions who provide them with a voice at work during these extraordinarily difficult times.
LERC faculty staff continue to work, but like most of you are now working remotely. Our physical office is closed for the time being, but we are responding to emails and calls the best we are able. Our research work and program planning continues.
We canceled our Metro Leadership program in Portland set for the end of April in response to precautions against group meetings. We will keep you posted on future programs scheduled for this summer, guided by the advice of public officials and health experts.
Obviously, the effects of COVID 19, both short and long-term, are likely to be far-reaching and profound. LERC’s faculty and staff remain committed to ensuring that the needs of workers receive priority. We also affirm our commitment to solidarity and collective action as labor values that will enable us to respond to COVID 19 with compassion and resolve.