An exterior perspective of one of the main entrances at the Hult Center located in downtown Eugene on Willamette Street in the evening. 

Reading Summary

The article The London Spikes Controversy: Homelessness, Urban Securitisation and the Question of Hostile Architecture by James Petty discusses the issue of hostile architecture in London and its impact on homelessness and urban security. The author explores the controversy surrounding the installation of metal spikes in public spaces, primarily targeting areas where homeless individuals seek shelter. The main point of the article is to examine how hostile architecture perpetuates social exclusion and reinforces inequalities within urban spaces. The author argues that the implementation of such measures, like metal spikes, is a form of securitization that aims to deter homeless individuals from occupying certain areas, rather than addressing the root causes of homelessness. Petty highlights the ethical implications of hostile architecture, asserting that it reflects a societal shift towards a more punitive approach to homelessness, where the focus is on removing or displacing homeless individuals rather than providing them with support and assistance. The article also discusses the broader implications of hostile architecture on social justice, public space, and the right to the city. By analyzing the London spikes controversy, the author challenges the notion that hostile architecture effectively addresses issues of urban security, arguing instead for a more inclusive and human rights-based approach to homelessness. Petty emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts between policymakers, urban planners, and social service providers to address homelessness holistically and create urban spaces that are welcoming and accessible for all.

Building Interpretation

The Hult Center in downtown Eugene presents an opportunity to analyze the theme of hostile architecture and its impact on public spaces. One aspect of the Hult Center’s design that aligns with the concept of hostile architecture is the presence of railings on the exterior stairs with attachments that deter skateboarding. While the intent may to be protect the building’s infrastructure, it creates a barrier that excludes skateboarders from freely enjoying a public space. Similarly, the presence of gendered restrooms in the Hult Center can be seen as perpetuating a binary understanding of gender and excluding individuals who do not identify within traditional gender categories. This raises questions about the center’s commitment to inclusivity and creating a welcoming space for all visitors. It prompts consideration of the benefits of adopting gender-neutral facilities, which can contribute to a more inclusive and affirming environment for individuals of diverse gender identities. Overall, the design choices at the Hult Center offer an opportunity to reflect on the importance of creating public spaces that are inclusive, accessible, and accommodating to various communities. By reconsidering and challenging these design elements, the center can foster a more diverse and welcoming environment, aligning with the principles of justice and equity.