remix discussion

Lessig brings up an amazing point in his article Comparing Cultures. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy that I can refer to first hand in a majority of the classes that I’ve taken here at U of O. Lessig states that, “most students come from an essentially RO education(fueled by professsionals). For four years, they’ve sat in large lecture halls, with a professor at the front essentially reading the same lecture she’s given year after year…the class is a forum within which that argument happens. Students don’t listen to lectures. They help make the lecture”(85-86). A majority of the classes that I’ve had here during my stint at the University of Oregon have been organized in this fashion. The teacher gets up there, reads off his slides, tells us what we need to know, then ends class. There were no discussions of any sorts simply him talking in front of the class. Naturally kids start tuning out, getting on their phones, and opening up laptops etc. This is simply just not an effective way to teach anymore. In order for students like me to learn the material we need to be engaged.  The classes that I’ve learned the most in have been structured with more of an RW style of teaching where the teacher starts the conversation then encourages students to chime in and state their opinion of the topic and what they think it means. This leads to one thing which leads to another and before you know it the entire class is getting involved and everyone is learning. I feel that more of an emphasis needs to be placed on this style of teaching as opposed to the old RO style because this is simply the way that our generation learns. Times are changing and in order for universities to continue to provide the best educational value for their students they must evolve teaching styles to meet the ever changing learning styles of its students.

One comment on “remix discussion

  1. Though some classes must be taught in a lecture style format, I do agree that a more open discussion leads to more engaged students and better learning. I read an article about the ineffectiveness of long lectures where the teacher stands in front of the class at lectures for the entire time, and my own experiences in college support this claim. Salman Khan noted,”Breaking the session down minute-by-minute, the study’s authors determined that students needed a three- to five-minute period of settling down, which would be followed by 10 to 18 minutes of optimal focus. Then — no matter how good the teacher or how compelling the subject matter — there would come a lapse.” (Khan) Interaction between students or between the student and teacher makes it more likely that students are learning. They don’t lose focus quickly, and it forces them to think for themselves rather than just mind-numbingly writing notes or spacing out. However, I do believe there is a place for lectures. Maybe the structure of lectures should be adjusted, but for courses like calculus it seems like a lecture format would still make more sense. I do think there is room for discussion even in a high-level math course though. It would be interesting to see the differences in student test scores when they go through a lecture type math course versus a discussion/lecture hybrid.

    Source:
    Khan, Salman. “Why Long Lectures Are Ineffective.” Ideas.Time.com. Time, 2 Oct. 2012. Web. 07 Mar. 2014. .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *