It ensures equality of citizens against public services, regardless of their convictions or beliefs.
This document, published on the France’s government website. It is unclear when it was published or who the name of the author. What is clear is the motive behind this document.
The document paints a portrait of France’s history in such a way that it leads the reader to believe that Laïcité was a natural outcome of development, like capitalism of globalization. It goes hand-in-hand with nation building. However, France’s religious laws are much different than the United States.
In 2011, the Institute for Advanced Studies and the College of France arranged a seminar to discuss “Politics, religion, and Laïcité.” They began by discussing a theoretical approach to religion, the state, and of course Laïcité. They talked about how religion may be considered a political object and that it is possible to think about pluralism and diversity, and to have theories about egalitarianism of religious liberty. They discussed a possible adoption of the diction and language used in the U.S. First Amendment to curtail any religious fervor that might come from laïcité. These academics are more aware than most citizens, and have more of a worldly, sophisticated view of religion and its role in the nation.
Professors at this seminar understand the growing trends interconnectedness through globalization and migration. Through this understanding, they debate the importance of changing the Laïcité laws and to adapt something a little less draconian.
Many attack the laws of Laïcité as harmful to minority religions. On the other hand, many educators in France would argue that the strict separation of church and state protect minorities from state oppression. This is exactly what the document tries to portray.
This document produced by gouvernement.fr is great for any novice or experienced historian to understand the complexities of Laïcité and the dominant position of those in charge of government.
Aaron Brown