Emma, Hadley, Palmer Pt 2 Review

Emma, Hadley, Palmer Pt 2 Review

 

Edited Review Slides:

 

Review notes

  • Basement structure (Emma has this) 
  • Views from the top floor
  • Larger overhang entryway into building (east side) (openness/connection/shelter) 
  • WHY are we pulling the new building forward
  • Shading vs views
  • Service needs for Allen and Friendly 
  • Permeability
  • Get the topography for the SE corner — site section
  • Include trees in our 3D massing and axons (did we forget some types?)
  • Create a structural section of intersection between bridge and Allen hall
  • Bridge = new material
    • What feeling do we want it to embody (an actual bridge? A passageway? A lounge area? An attraction?) base material off of what type of feeling
    • Look into current “bridge” of Allen hall between the old and 2013 have that help influence
    • Look at south facade of allen to help with bridge intersection
  • Create a larger entryway (facade study)
  • In structural 3D model:
    • Change structure in basement and floor connection to be concrete 
    • “Nuisance plan a bit more in structure” (hard for a grid to accommodate all different programs – subdivide grid)
  • Looking a bit more ~ experientially ~ 
    • Top floor will be the most separated from the ground (most affected by winter and most distant from buzz of campus)
    • I’ve set up a hierarchy of people ?? stop ?
    • “Use a finer siv to stitch this building together”
  • Programming doesn’t need to be “so clean” – because it will change over time, take into account some fluidity
  • Uniqueness of the facade and its varying materials (ie tiles) : figure out how to express this on the inside as well 
  • Want to account for “graceful aging”
  • Clarify entrance points
  • Precedent : look at pathway directly East of our place
  • Centerpiece of project: SE side. What’s going on the inside of this corner space? What will the massing and facade look like? 
  • Ignacio says: don’t throw this away but it is garbage. Go onto iteration 2 & 3 now
  • Currently, no interaction between site & building & floors. Section has no quality. Needs interaction between floors and between the inside/outside
  • If we’re retaining the walkway, use campus pattern strategy to not only retain the good things, but make them better. How will our bridge and the transparency of our building & program nearest to the walkway improve upon the circulation space?

 

Untouched Slides: