During one the class session that was held last Thursday, the class all presented their end of the term projects. Many interesting and really cool projects were presented. I had to give feedback on each, and in return, I got feedback on mine as well. As mentioned in earlier journals, I am focusing on the human anatomy and how people are all different through body structure and shape, even if they are in the same poses or facial expressions. The feedback I got from the other students were really informative and they gave great suggestions on what I should do to improve.
Through my peer responses, I realized that they really liked my project all together. The example drawings I presented (one example above) caught their interest and they also really enjoyed a live sketching I did. I received a lot of positive comments and minor confusion that can be easily fixed or added to the project’s process. The suggestions given of what I could also do for my project were around the same area. A lot of them wanted me to do a time-lapse video of me drawing to make it more interactive which is a really good idea. I would love to add that in to my project.
I believe that my peer reviews were very helpful and are improving my project rather than throwing “impossible” or more things to do. This makes it a lot easier for me and I do not have to stress as much about if my project was even a good idea to begin with. I thought in the beginning that I might have to do more in order for my project to be more appealing, but I was wrong. I am happy that my peers supported me for it.
Based on “Journal 11,” what future topics or themes does the author hint at exploring in upcoming entries? Visit us Telkom University