The Fascinating Ecology of Charles Darwin and Rachel Carson

Although Charles Darwin is best noted as the father of evolution, within the Origin of Species  there is also a blossoming fascination with what would become the science of ecology. Ecology can be defined as the scientific study of the relationships that living organisms have with each other and their environment. This budding ecology can be seen throughout, but is particularly evident in Darwin’s “clover-bee- cat” illustration of how “plants and animals are bound together by a complex web of relations”(Darwin 74). Similarly, Rachel Carson shares a ecological fascination with “intersections and connections” (Carson xii) while maintaining an ever present awareness of the whole. Curiously,  in “A Fable for Tomorrow”, Carson employs a strikingly similar illustration of how one organism can alter an entire ecosystems.

To illustrate the metaphor of a “complex web of relations”, Darwin drew on a local clover and its relationship to other organisms. “ I have found the visits of bees are….highly beneficial to the fertilization of our clovers… if the whole genus of humble bees became extinct…in England…the red clover would..wholly disappear.”(Darwin 75) Darwin goes on to explain the correlation between large numbers of field mice and a decreased number of bee nests, raided by mice. “ Now the number of mice is largely dependent…on the number of cats…near villages and towns I have found the nests of humble bees more numerous which I attribute to the number of cats that destroy the mice.”(Darwin 75) With apparent glee, Darwin connects an abundance of clover to a large number of felines. “Hence it is quite credible that the presence of a feline animal in large numbers…might determine, through the intervention of mice and then of bees, the frequency of certain flowers in that district!” Darwin’s delight in making these ecological connections is apparent in the speedy syntax of this passage. We can almost see an excited smile on Darwin’s face as he closes the passage with an exclamation point.

In contrast to the joyful tone of Darwin’s web of relations, Carson employs a similar description to express the devastating influence one organism can affect throughout an entire ecosystem. In “A Fable for Tomorrow”, Carson paints a pastoral paradise of humans and nature living harmoniously together. A dark blight then creeps over the land striking animals and humans alike with sickness and death. Violently ill songbirds birds fall silent and the chickens lay infertile eggs. Like Darwin, Carson cleverly mentions the relationship of bee’s and plant life. “The apple trees were coming into bloom but no bees droned among the blossoms, so there was no pollination and there would be no fruit… No witchcraft, no enemy had silenced the rebirth of life in this stricken world. The people had done it themselves.”(Carson 3) Carson ends the passage and begins Silent Spring with the foreboding sentiment that this will be a vision of the future if one organism, man, is unchecked in his affect on the whole.

 

 

 

 

 

2 thoughts on “The Fascinating Ecology of Charles Darwin and Rachel Carson

  1. It is interesting that the tropes of web, harmony, and interconnection can serve such different purposes, depending on the time period and the subject matter. I like your description of Darwin having an excited smile as he explains the ecological connections of his theory of evolution. I agree that for Carson interconnection and the web-like quality of nature is not delightful. You might also want to look at the way she describes this in the chapter “Elixirs of Death.” She explains how the web of life has rather become a web of death: “The world of systemic insecticides is a weird world, surpassing the imaginings of the brothers Grimm — perhaps most closely akin to the cartoon world of Charles Addams. It is a world where the enchanted forest of the fairy tales has become the poisonous forest in which an insect that chews a leaf or sucks the sap of a plant is doomed” (Carson 33). In an age of pesticides, insecticides, and human meddling in nature, interconnection is not some happy joyful thing (as it was for Darwin). Great post!

  2. I like how you acknowledge Darwin’s excitement about some of the things he’s realizing. I think it’s interesting what an exception Man is in the struggle for existence. On one hand, a Darwinian argument could be that everything is always competing to the best of its abilities, including Man, so using resources towards our endeavors makes perfect sense, whereas trying to ‘save’ some other species or act in a way that’s not geared toward self-preservation goes against how Nature works. The other side of that is the whole great responsibility follows great power sentiment. Carson describes humans that are “unchecked” basically as the enemy of the rest of the Earth. She believes humans have the power to destroy the Earth’s ecosystem, and since we have that special power, we owe it to other species to not let that happen. I wonder what percentage of her inspiration is concerned with the animals themselves, and how much is concerned about the aesthetic beauty of the her own environment. It’s an extremely pessimistic perspective but I think it’s interesting. George Carlin has an amazing standup where he talks about his admittedly twisted stance on climate change. One paraphrased argument he makes is that… environmentalists don’t care about the planet in the abstract, they care about a clean place to live, their own habitat.. The Earth’s been through iceages, asteroid hits, magnetic pole reversal etc. etc alot worse than us… when stuff hits the fan, the planet’s not going anywhere. We are!…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw
    Btw if you don’t know Carlin, he talks about this stuff the way he does so that people will pay attention and think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *