The passage starting in paragraph two on page 81 in the Norton Critical Edition of Walden by Thoreau clearly shows tension between nature and society as a train cuts through Walden Pond. However, I believe even Thoreau feels conflicted about the meeting of these two opposing forces.
The chapter is Sounds, and, early on, Thoreau establishes his intimate knowledge of this meeting ground by saying the men who work on the freight trains bow to him as to an old acquaintance. This seems to give Thoreau credibility in the eyes of the reader. Immediately before that Thoreau explains how he commonly walks the railroad causeway, using the word often, and he even says he is “related to society by this link.” The two key words that stand out here are often and related. Thoreau is careful to express the habitualness of this walk through the use of the word often and the descriptions of his mutual comfort with the men of the train. He then uses the word related, a word commonly used to describe a familial connection to refer to the track. I believe this paragraph shows Thoreau’s uses for the meeting of the two worlds and paints them in a positive light.
The start of the following paragraph could not be more different. Thoreau describes how the whistle of the train “penetrates my woods summer and winter, sounding like the scream of a hawk sailing over some farmer’s yard.” The verb used here is penetrate, a word associated with forcing a way through something. The segments involving the train continuously interrupt the beautiful parts of Thoreau’s life in the nature and his equally beautiful descriptions of those details. He then specifies the time frame, using multiple seasons to emphasize the length of the suffering. To top that off he compares the train to a hawk, perhaps the most famous bird of prey. Going into detail, he describes the arrival of these “restless city merchants” who prey on the people and their land but serve everyone at the same time. This would make sense because the hawk is known to be extremely intelligent as are the people who continuously prey on the land. There are some added lines of detailed acts in which the country is converted to produce a product such as meadows to cloth. In conclusion he says, “Nor is there any man so independent on his farm that he can say them nay.” Here I believe he means that even the most georgic of individuals require some link to society similar to the one I believe Thoreau has previously established with the railroad.
These two passages back to back seem to show two very different trains of thought on trains. Thoreau clearly establishes his need for a link to society while also continuously despising the unavoidable results that come along with just that. It’s a vicious cycle in which man needs society which harms his environment which is kept by man. This conflict is what constantly keeps nature and society in tension, even in someone as dedicated to nature as Thoreau.
I like how you used the two paragraphs to show the two different views on the train. I think these passages were perfect for back to back to show the love-hate relationship Thoreau has with the train.
I agree that the train’s presence serves to tether Thoreau to civilization. Even as he has withdrawn into nature, his revere is often disturbed by the predictable sound of the locomotive passing. It contrasts sharply with the unorganized and fleeting movements of wild animals. I think that it also serves as a useful foil for Thoreau to comment about the daily lives of men, as it reminds him of their unseen habits amid his contemplation of nature’s quite different pace.
Nice close reading. I like how Thoreau does this sort of thing, it confuses the hell out of me at first, but after reading the passage a few times I agree with you. The train that penetrates his solitude in nature is just as contrasting with his situation as these two paragraphs are next to each other. Maybe the train helps Thoreau feel like he is in some way still connected, but only briefly. I like the imagery he uses in this section.
You are right to note that Thoreau seems conflicted by the presence of the train and about the relationship between country and city, nature and civilization. I’m a bit unclear what you mean by “the most georgic of individuals.” We don’t usually think of an individual as being georgic; a landscape or the depiction of a landscape is georgic. Some other questions you might want to consider if you continue to write about this passage: why does Thoreau cite the three lines of Ellery Channing’s poem? Why do you think he writes that “they take me for an employee; and so I am. I too would fain be a track-repairer somewhere in the orbit of the earth”? Also, you might want to take into account the way Thoreau describes the relationship between country and city on the top of page 82, the way in which he describes the connection between the two as a connection based on different kinds material goods traveling in either direction. Furthermore, notice that on the bottom of page 83, Thoreau explains why he likes the railroad, and specifically its intimations of commerce: “Why recommends commerce to me is its enterprise and bravery.” And on page 84 Thoreau seems to like the railroad because it imaginatively connects him to other parts of the world (to foreign parts and tropical climes).
Thanks to all for the feedback! Stephen, I ended up expanding on this for my close reading paper so I believe all of your questions will be answered there, or at least I tried.