In the 1960s European films Peeping Tom (Powell, 1960) and 8 ½ (Fellini, 1963), the viewer is asked to sympathize with characters that are fundamentally sociopathic (a personality lacking moral responsibility or social conscience1), yet the evocation of this sympathy by the viewer is expressed in different stages of the films’ narratives.
Peeping Tom immediately introduces the viewer to a character that is questionable and asocial. The opening scene of the film displays the main character Mark filming his trickery and murder of a prostitute. An audience in 1960 England would without a doubt react to this with a feeling of hatred and scorn. However, throughout the movie, Mark is re-humanized by unveiling his psychology and motives. Towards the end of the film, Mark discusses Scopophilia with a psychiatrist, which is the pleasure of looking and objectifying. Tangentially, it is slowly revealed through his friendship with the character Helen that his father, who used fear to study his psychology, emotionally abused him from a young age. Perhaps this abuse induced the need to both repress his desires to visualize fear in becoming anti-social, as well as to project his fear onto others through inducing and filming their fear. Mark is therefore humanized through the use of familiar psychology, which requires the viewer to feel sympathy for this man who is characterized by the most psycho- and sociopathic behavior, and causes varying degrees of discomfort.
A similar discomfort comes in the viewer’s decision to sympathize or not in the Italian film 8 ½. Although the viewer’s perspective on Guido (8 ½’s main character) is very different than on Mark of Peeping Tom, Guido’s sociopathic behavior of narcissism makes him difficult to sympathize with. However, the difference between the films comes in the fact that the viewer is not initially as starkly judgmental of Guido and is introduced to his psychological situation from the start of the film (by starting with his dream of being trapped and suffocated). The viewer feels sympathy during his various flashbacks and dreams that employ the theories of the symbolic, where the child learns to repress desire from symbology, such as the by the church in 8 ½. Similarly, Guido attempts to balance his Id and Superego, psychoanalytical idioms for subconscious desires and the internalization of moral codes, respectively. Guido seems to increasingly lack a strong ego, which mediates the two above, in his allowance of the id to dominate over the superego. Throughout the film, his sociopathic view towards, treatment of, and relationships with others make it increasingly hard to sympathize with his character.
Both films were on the forefront of introducing film viewers to the psychology of characters, rather than just their entertainment value, which was a valuable introduction to the art of film in the mid twentieth century. The two films, Peeping Tom and 8 ½, create a sense of discomfort in the viewers because of the poignant ability the respective films have to evoke sympathy in the dark-minded, sociopathic leading men.
1. sociopathy. Dictionary.com. Collins English Dictionary – Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. HarperCollins Publishers. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sociopathy (accessed: May 09, 2014).
Your post really made me think about the connection between Mark in Peeping Tom, and Guido in 8 1/2. I had never thought to compare the two before, but with your post you have really enlightened the connection between the two. Both characters are on different sides of their sociopath personality, but nevertheless, it is something that they both struggle with, and it is what shapes each storyline. I completely agree with your statement that the viewer’s opinion for the characters in each film changes as the films progress. Whereas a viewer had no sympathy for Mark in the beginning, their view may change once they see the flashbacks of his emotional torment he endured as a child, that made him the way he is. As for Guido, one may begin to sympathize with him less as the film progresses when they see his narcissism.
I really enjoyed the parallel you made between 8 1/2 and Peeping Tom. I completely agree that there is, for both characters, an ambivalence that made us wondering if we are suppose to hate them or on the contrary we should feel sympathy for them.
For example, Mark is a voyeur and a serial killer but on the other hand the flashbacks from his childhood show us he was raised by an abusing father. This is meant to explain why he is so messed up. So, can Mark really be considered responsible for his actions ?
I love when an anaIysis made you see what you did not notice immediately, but then ,while you’re reading everything feels so evident and clear. That means you did a good job.
I love when an anaIysis made you see what did not notice but then it feels so evident and clear. That means you did a good job.
While surfing the web, this blog has been led.
There are many very fresh posts. Enough to get my attention. I’ll come to check often.
토토 핸드
카지노 사이트 추천
사설 토토 사이트
스포츠 토토 배당률
스포츠 토토 승부 식
https://www.j9korea.com
I am glad you take pride in what you write. หวย ลาว สมัคร
I appreciate the thoughtfulness and care with which you approached your subject matter. sòng bạc yeebet
Your article has broadened my understanding and challenged my preconceptions.ซื้อ หวย เกาหลี