This Post is about human rights and the relationships between humanitarian law and genocides. In America and other industrialized nations, people’s reactions when asked to define human rights are sometimes reluctant, or they may even wonder why we are even asking the issue. It demonstrates how many individuals as a whole are accustomed to observing human rights and have never had to personally consider them. However, there are several nations having insufficient human rights, which frequently harms the populace in various ways.
Given its importance, particularly during times of war, humanitarian law is sometimes referred to as “the law of the war.” Due to the many ethical traditions and world views held by nations, as well as the system itself, it is likely to fail. Self-defense that has been approved by the United Nations security council is an exception to International Humanitarian Law (IHL). The United States, China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and Canada are the other three permanent members of the Security Council. It is very challenging to pass international laws, including laws pertaining to human rights, in the security council because every nation has the right to veto the decision.
Little to none is known about Turkmenistan, however there are barely any women allowed to speak out. As a result it is assumed that Women and children are on the bottom of the hierarchal chart and it is quiet bad for them.
The citizens rights are like North Korea, that there is none. The lack of money, and jobs make the people rely on the Government for help creating a dictatorship that cannot be overthrown.