The second review went quite well. The reviewers agreed that the approach to the site was interesting but requires a more in depth interaction with the limited landscape. The site needs to be interwoven with the urban environment and bring people in, in a more subtle way? The site is very exposed to all the elements and there are quite a few responses that can be used: sloped roof/water cistern, maximum exposure for solar panels and multiple small wind turbines are good points but the actual fact that the site is set aside by the design of the highways and recuperated/reintegrated into society is the most sustainable approach/point of the design.
Images to be uploaded soon.