Categories

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Macro/Micro Study + The Review

MACRO study

From the first initial diagrams I posted in my last post, I developed a site plan which has 4  buildings, each house its own theater, scattered all over the site all the way out to the river. All of which will be connected together through a natural habitat pathway. In my drawings, the Salmon street is blocked by a building and the project extends throughout the 200′ block.

Problem:

The biggest problem I already knew when producing the drawings is that my program is not big enough to cover the 200 sq. ft. city block.

MICRO study

For the micro study, I went back to my site with my camera and took pictures of everything on the site I found interesting – the layers of things which made me chose this site in the first place. Which results in this collage.

Part of the micro study is the material study. I’ve found a very interesting material called LiTraCon which is also known as translucent concrete. In a nutshell, it is concrete casted with fiberglass. It sounded pretty easy to make. Too easy that I had to try to see if it will work.

I happened to have an acrylic rod in my material box which is close enough for a test object. And I chose to use rockite as a replacement for concrete since I’ve had experience with it before and it dries much faster than the actual concrete. With that, I made a form from cardboard and cast a block of concrete with acrylic rod. And here it is.

casting

I successfully made it translucent

THE REVIEW

I felt pretty good after the review. I’m glad it went in the conversational direction instead of me presenting like it is a final work. A few things for me to consider …

  • Blocking Salmon street with a building may not be such a good idea. Especially, when I’m trying to connect Water Ave to the river. I should have seen that coming, really.
  • Maybe my project site could be Salmon street itself, and I can build around it.
  • If I want to build in the water, go all the way into the water!

I almost forgot to talk about the material study during the review. Luckily, architects love their concrete, so it got brought up – which I’m glad. I think it really helped the reviewers understand what this project could potentially look like. I definitely want to explore more into what else I could do with this material. More casting coming up soon.


No comments yet to Macro/Micro Study + The Review

  • nywc

    Nan, I’m glad you captured the process of making your block. I’m hoping you can create a photo that shows the light transmitting property of the rods – that’s what makes the block interesting. It would be really great if you could use a photo of that texture as a tile in a Photoshop perspective grid to convey how it would work at a different scale. See how the Vanishing point works: http://www.picturesocial.com/video/video/show?id=1483478:Video:76489 The photo could capture some of the real lighting effects.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>