What Walls!

‘In Mexico, it is the wall itself that dominates… walls are used in more powerful ways in Mexico than in other places, to suggest strength, tragedy, peace, or light.’

I admire Legorreta’s talent for creating such wonderful walls.  His buildings have a simple massive elegance that create a powerful statement.  I see Legoretta’s or Luis Barragan’s work and think of it as ‘the Mexican style,’ but these two are the only Mexican architects with which I am familiar.   I question, how will this bold architecture fit within the urban fabric of San Francisco?

The Mexican Museum

The Mexican Museum, San Francisco

Fitting.Framing.Forming.

ghost9

Ghost 9

Brian MacKay-Lyons’ theories of Fitting.Framing.Forming. are easily expressed through the imagery of his Ghost Lab work.  In this annual building workshop, students are inspired by the experience of construction to design and build a structure within two weeks.  The structure remains on the Nova Scotian coastal site for one year, until it becomes a ghost, when it is deconstructed to create building material for the next workshop.  These temporary structures contribute to the ever changing spirit of place at this unique site.

Legoretta Post

In the interview p. 20 two factors became apparent.

R. Legoretta  ….”with pre Columbian architecture we have to meditate on simplicity…….based on simple masses

 While traveling the country side and “looking at” the villages of Mexico he had an encounter with a farmer which lead him to understand that many people were economically poor but spiritually rich.  Legoretto determined that he would design architecture that truly serves the people.

 Do you think his exuberance for “viva la Mexico” is apparent in his work?

 

I think it is very apparent in his work especially as he explains his approach to design as a devotion to architecture that truly serves  people and makes them happy. It is really apartment in the example of the IBM factory  where he gives as much importance to the assembly lines work space as he does with the office spaces.  Placing the offices on the same level as the assembly lines really gives one the sence that he is trying to capture in the  essence of building for the people creating an equal working environment that doesn’t display any hierarchy between the two different groups of the white collar and blue collar workers at the IBM factory.

Which project (any in the book) seems to convey Legorreto’s sense of mystery to you?

The MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART MARCO in my opinion seems to convey the sense of mystery that Legorreto wants to capture. There are elements in many parts of the building that make you question the reason for their placement or even how these elements are accomplished such as in the yellow column that intrudes its way through the plane of the ceiling to stop right before reaching the plane of the pedestal. The Column then is hollowed out and given an accent of light that expresses to me a mystery to where the light is coming from.

column

Rick you are so joyous

Rick Joy makes architecture look so easy.

I believe a large  part of this comes from his understanding of landscape and context. His use of materials, particularly  rammed earth, and his sculptural attitude towards the landscape are very memorable in photos. I would love to experience the buildings themselves after reading their vivid descriptions.

I did not really understand Steven Holl’s comments that Rick Joy is operating ‘on the fringe’. Obviously he has a small practice  but it seems he has gained a lot of notoriety and mainstream attention in a relatively small amount of time. While sometimes it seems that large firms and celebrity architects define the profession, from what I have experienced and read most practitioners actually work in small firms or are self-employed.  From what I know Rick Joy is very well respected in the architectural community and while he may be better at what he does than most of us,  I do not see him as the radical or outside the mainstream. Maybe my perspective is misinformed… but I would at least like to think that all of us would strive for the same type of attention to materials, light, landscape, and place as Rick Joy and that these are basic architectural considerations.

Rick Joy Reading Response

Rick Joy, “We are continually striving to create architecture that is regionally sympathetic and well grounded in the context and community of its place.”

 Do you think his use of materials and building form are convincing?  Use specific examples.

 I think his use of materials in order to be well grounded into its context is very convincing especially after visiting desert landscapes near Las Vegas such as the Valley of Fire  similar to Rick joys region of Tucson. As Juhani Pallamaa describes in the introduction there is really something about the vast emptiness of the desert that provides an emotion of isolation very similar to the feeling that over takes our senses when we approach great architectural spaces. Rick joy captures these experiential qualities very well such as his use of frosted glass  in the Hoffman Residence.Hoffman house

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 I haven’t visited the building but, from the picture the use of the glass can be seen giving the sense of vastness that gives one the impression that the landscape goes on forever due to the semi opaque nature of the glass and its ability to project the contours of the landscape on the outside. I really see parallels to this image with the experience of being in the desert landscape during a morning sunrise in which the landscape is slowly revealed to you in layers of the contours of the desert landscapes valleys, ridges and vegetation.

american-southwest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

..

Zoo Reading Response

In the readings I found it very useful for formulating concepts from the site and how simple ideas can also become very complex. Nakijin Community center has simple rigid structure that is almost overtaken by the plants that grow on its roof. The plan reveals just how structured building becomes underneath its roof at the same time maintaining a complex program that is related to their ideas to space. Though the structural grid is strict because of their treatment of how they consider the balance between open, enclosed, and semi-enclosed space they are able to create spatial qualities that vary throughout the entire structure. The same concept of the balance between open and enclosed space follows throughout their other projects and fits very well with Nago City Hall as it provides a strong relation to their ideas of Governmental Buildings. These buildings exist because of the people and it is an important function that the public has domain within its structure the way that Nago City Hall incorporates the open spaces in the form of Asagi Terrace. In my opinion, these spaces within the building provide the citizens with the sense of transparency with the  government which is one is very revealing to what architecture can do politically.

Joy’s Uncompleted Taos Work

In 2007, Rick Joy started constructing a house and stable in Taos, New Mexico.  In 2009, the client filed bankruptcy, and the house was left uncompleted.  The house was to be the first of its kind- a series of 50 foot wide barrel-vaults built of rammed earth.  Out of curiosity, I went with a few friend’s to explore the abandoned construction site.  As we approached on foot, walking along the access road down into a valley and up again to the house entrance, we were confronted by a graveyard of full-scale window mock-ups and abandoned steel beams.  We walked through a sample barrel vault, and to a pile of earth (probably intended as ramming material).  The site look as if the contractor was there one day, and the next he just didn’t come back, leaving an interesting archeology for us to explore.  We were unable to get inside the one completed wing of the building, but the huge windows allowed us to see the interior of all of the major rooms- revealing the impressive barrel-vaulted ceilings.  From the exterior we were still able to experience the most important connection to nature- a 15 x 40 window from the main living space overlooking the Taos desert valley.  The beauty of the project was that the completed parts of the buildings integrated seamlessly with the uncompleted parts and with desert surroundings.  Some things are better left unfinished.

ghost

“…the suggestion seems to be that within this freedom to complete the “design,” the viewer is actually free to invent and add a personal interpretation of the structure’s missing parts, searching experimentally for the conclusive envelope of an edifice.”

I really appreciate the way that McKay-Lyons engages the user in his buildings.  The inhabitants of a building actually complete the design through the act of dwelling.   The Ghost series showcases beautifully lonely work, but with the addition of people these structures become resurrected.

Team Zoo

I find Team Zoo’s projects inspirational for their unique and thoughtful use of one of the most overlooked building materials of our time: concrete block.  It is cheap, and readily available in most parts of the world. Its affordability puts it off to many designers (and especially students), but it should not be written off so easily.

When I volunteered in Panama this summer, I was a little surprised (at first) at how popular concrete block was in that region.  I had expected to see more prevalence of vernacular structures…and concrete block is such a universally available building material these days that it made me feel as if the Panamanians had lost their connection to the land through using this material.  But after staying there for a week, and seeing the issues that they had to cope with in terms of rain and insects, I grew to understand the tendency to prefer concrete block.  But the traditional and the improvised wooden structures that I saw down there were far more  interesting to me than the concrete block structures.  Even though the block had started to be utilized in ways that were effective to their climate.  The homogeneity of the concrete block resulted in less innovation.  It had more restrictions of assembly in comparison to building with natural materials, and the rawness of character that is present in building with sticks and leaves was largely absent in the concrete buildings.