OCCUPATION: A Lecture by Brad Cloepfil, AIA, Allied Works Architecture

Brad Cloepfil Designs for Place

By Sabina Samiee

Architect Brad Cloepfil, AIA, released the book, Allied Works Architecture / Brad Cloepfil: Occupation in 2011.
[Text by Sandy Isenstadt, Kenneth Frampton.Photographs by Victoria Sambunaris.Hardcover / Slipcase / Clothbound440 pages, Illustrated throughout.$85.00 (ISBN: 9780980024258)]

Allied Works' proposal for a new pavilion for Musée national des beaux-arts du Québec features five interlocking, cantilevered concrete shells. Image courtesy Allied Works Architecture.

Internationally recognized along with his firm, Allied Works Architecture, Cloepfil and his team have designed a number of influential buildings and master plans for major cultural, educational, commercial and residential clients. The book is a “comprehensive monograph” that covers Allied Works’ important commissions from 1994 to 2011, including the world headquarters for Wieden+Kennedy (2000), the Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis (2003), the Booker T. Washington High School for the Performing and Visual Arts (2008), the Clyfford Still Museum (2011), and the forthcoming National Music Centre of Canada in Calgary, Alberta (2014) — and contains an extensive selection of images documenting each project. These include context photography by Victoria Sambunaris, sketches by Cloepfil, physical models, and architectural drawings. Called “highly readable dialogues,” this collection effectively illuminates numerous aspects of Cloepfil’s approach to architecture as well as revealing a variety of personal elements that influence and inform his work.

Cloepfil addresses his University of Oregon in Portland audience, April 2012.

On April 12, 2012, Cloepfil came to the University of Oregon in Portland at the White Stag Block to deliver  his lecture “OCCUPATION.”  The title of his lecture was borrowed from his recently published book, a choice presumably made as he spoke about the designs incorporated into the text.  Speaking to a small, intimate audience, the scale was human, the conversation approachable and the discourse provocative and engrossing.  In a way, this setting was very much akin to Cloepfil’s architectural practice, his reasoning of grounding a connection, in this case, between audience and speaker (rather than earth and building).  With such a closely woven experience, Cloepfil’s  advocacy for a keen recognition of setting and environment was very apparent.  His carefully articulated lecture was absorbed by grateful, autograph seeking students together with a calm and interested audience that melded students and community designers interested in hearing firsthand the eloquence of this University of Oregon architecture alumnus [BArch ’80].

As an architect, Cloepfil, a sort of Portland design deity, rarely needs more introduction than to mention that he is principal founder of Allied Works Architecture, with offices based in both Portland and New York.  His name is synonymous with positive downtown monumental, restorative projects of immense creativity and contribution to the city and landscape in which they are integrated.  His reputation as a self-assured maverick innovator somewhat precedes him; his penchant and ability to soothingly deliver eloquent and linguistically stunning monologues on his designs and theory also is well-known.  I was intrigued by this combination of personality and practice, and welcomed the opportunity to join the group of Cloepfil disciples who converged on the White Stag April 12.  So it was on that Thursday evening that I assembled with an attentive White Stag audience. Comfortably sitting in darkness, we awaited great things and slide images of inspiring vision.

Cloepfil signs a copy of his book for a UO Department of Architecture student.

Cloepfil began by saying architecture is an “act that amplifies insight into a place.”  He urged his audience to see a very specific environmental context to building design and to see things one would not normally see by really looking at “place, noticing order, forces at play, qualities not immediately obvious, characteristics and conditions.”  We learned that Cloepfil finds Oregon’s hazelnut orchards to be his “favorite architecture”;  the texture and
quality of light that the rows of trees present “create the opportunity for action” and the “possibility of response.”

Using the brilliant word “ENTWINEMENT,” (which to me sounds like a beautiful almost sculptural illusionary portmanteau for architectural theory), Clopefil spoke of his Maryhill Overlook as “building a wall ….as a reference point that would measure and magnify everything around it.”  Sort of entwining the land, the light, the
aesthetic of design and the materials.  It is an intentional method to inspire and provoke a thought: “what impact can architecture have in a landscape?”

Addressing his design ideals, Cloepfil says, “walls” have the ability to “weave a pattern;” and “landscape and light” can bring the inside outside and vice versa.  Recognizing that, we can proceed to the architect’s foremost concept that a structure “should knit itself” into its environment, as his Dutchess County Residence Guest House (New York) establishes its location and occupies a deciduous forest becoming “a bridge for the intimate acts of living.”

Cloepfil's Dutchess County Residence Guest House, New York. Image courtesy of photographer Dean Kaufman.

Most importantly, continues Cloepfil, despite the use of materials like steel, glass and wood, the very ingredients of the design must emerge, flow,  and wander in the natural landscape not limiting nor preventing a sense of the natural environment which must prevail and “hold to the ground.”

Perhaps it was Cloepfil’s admission of his love for the “American landscape,” an urban landscape, he says, that is inherently “beautiful” that gently coaxed his audience to sit farther forward on their seats, listening even more intently.  The slide image backdrop was now a lot in St. Louis, bare and flat mowed grass: to some, devoid of inspiration.  To Cloepfil, this “urban prairie of undifferentiated space” is boundless and gives the opportunity to the architect to explore a “ribbon and rodeo of planes” of a structurally transparent and responsive environment.   Cloepfil spoke passionately of  possibility in such a seemingly barren cityscape:  he sees a monumentality in the sky,  and he imagines an architecture that will “hold this space”, a space of both “relic and ruin,” of “grace and offering.”

When Cloepfil turned to commissions not won (with the graciously unpretentious comment, “and these are projects we did not get….”), he showed work imagined yet not completed.  His ideas still realistically leapt off the slide screen in carefully crafted models, the barest of sketches some almost Rodinesque in their simplicity and single line use.

Throughout the image | model tour of Allied Works three dimensional visions, Cloepfil’s adoration of light and the bridging of structure in a space  remained consistently evident: his “series of walls that dance across the landscape” that “cantilever and transform….filter light and space” all contributing to our understanding of this individual as ultimately concerned with the quality of a place.  Cloepfil is not just enamoured with structural studies, the formulation of a working plan and building:  his methodology transcends this to take a design into a matrix of structure and space where  even the seams and crevices of a wall achieve relevance.

Cloepfil introduced us to his use of EMBEDMENT, a building holding its ground or being embedded in the ground and under a boundless sky.  He spoke of using the structure as an element that would be brought to the ground creating one solid place where the qualities of light and the rendering of a surface will be given the chance to interact and create a play of light and shadow.  There exists a pressing or rooting to the earth that enables the structure to rise up– every surface infused with importance.   EMBEDMENT becomes a key element of Cloepfil’s aesthetic: the ability to produce a grounded yet watery-shimmer of light with the placement and exploration of materiality.

AMPLIFICATION, says Cloepfil, as he continued on his detailed design discourse, is the ability of a building to amplify something (a condition) to elevate a concept, to suppress other things.  Somewhat abstract, AMPLIFICATION was embraced by Cloepfil’s proposal for the National Music Centre of Canada (Calgary) where the strong Alberta landscape situated between soaring mountain and vast prairie called for the weaving of structure and land and yet to still needed to manifest a significant cultural appreciation.  About the NMC, Cloepfil speaks of the material quality that “creates this world” and how the “interior walls move with a geometry” as light scampers at will up and down the walls ”unifying all.”

Drawing his lecture to a close, Cloepfil said “boldness is required to expand human and natural resources.”  A sense of humility creates architecture by “allowing the influence of other factors that enrich and extend the life of a building.”  It is this “humility” in design that posits a question of what architecture can really offer.  Says Cloepfil, it “creates an experience that enriches the life of the place.”

As for us here in downtown Portland, and those who pass by Cloepfil’s much-lauded Wieden+Kennedy building, why not look around, perhaps more than usual while on a daily trek?  On those days when I wander our cherished P-town, I am usually in search of an early morning cappuccino, with my eyes aware only of the Oregon gray skies and dim morning light, my step full-steam ahead to avoid impending rain and work-rushed vehicles. I have to say Cloepfil’s insights  have somewhat altered my state of mind.  Cloepfil says, yes, the Oregon skies are gray, and yes, he unabashedly uses concrete (“for its malleability and earth-like quality”) which might magnify Oregon’s spectacular calm gray-ness.  And this seems to be the point, Cloepfil’s designs sit firmly on their
ground, confident, self-assured, permanent, strong and vital—but different and attractively stand-alone in dramatic and assertive ways.  A part of the built environment, Cloepfil’s buildings clear of distractions around them creating a space that then fills with light, is receptive to movement and sound, and embraces the activity takes place within.

Cloepfil mentioned in his lecture that his Maryhill Overlook is a reference point in the landscape, “a measure and a magnifier of everything around it.”   Strike out a little, venture east of Portland far up the Columbia River Gorge and go see Allied Works’ Maryhill Overlook.  Grapple with this ribbon of concrete that seems to push up from the flat, expansive bluff to lie open and inviting to the limitless skyscape and imagine a connection—the bond between earth and sky, the seamless reach of silverish poured concrete beaming up into the vast Oregon sky.  It is a basking mirror of the light and landscape of the Columbia River Gorge’s natural greatness, reflecting the illumination and cloud cover of an ever-changing vault of atmosphere.

As the human element that comes into Cloepfil’s created spaces, we get to experience with a depth and emotion, that sense of being enveloped by architecture while it assists in how we interact with our surroundings.   Cloepfil’s lecture urged us to look outside the expansive skins of glass fenestration to the wonder and vastness of nature and sky, or observe the movement on a street, the bustle of daily life and to see a connection between the interior and the exterior.  At the forest-snuggled Dutchess Residence Guest House, glass walls encourage interaction and acknowledgement of trees, light and space.   As the architect notes, these designs seek to recognize the transparency of flowing through a space, light cascading down to dance in a path, chasing or following us with shadow, and immersing our body in illumination (even on a gray day, there is light).    Cloepfil’s designs don’t just invite the sunlight in, it is given its own space—it owns and occupies and moves around the building just as people will.  And perhaps is given center stage.

Cloepfil’s walls of glass, his bridal-like screens of trees behind from which peer facades, walls and windows; his wrapping, meshing, and giving of a place all contribute to an experience where we, as his receptive audience and the ultimate user’s of his work, get to “occupy” in the best way possible.  The human element is invited to occupy these spaces and places of Cloepfil’s creation, and as Cloepfil explains to flow into, out of and around buildings of concrete, glass, steel, and slate combined in a way that gives us a sense of place, context and of relating to and being connected with our environment. While inside a Cloepfil building are we given a chance to take the pulse of a city, to enjoy the spontaneous energy of a day, to relish the lives of clouds, and the expanse of a environment.  His integration of interior and exterior spaces seem to advocate for our recognition of more than ourselves.  It is architecture that brazenly requests we look around and notice “place.”   While Cloepfil somewhat apologetically referred to “place”  as his inspiration and the grounding element in all Allied Works designs, he nonetheless called it an “old fashioned term.”  It is “place”, says Cloepfil that gives us the sense of belonging, being connected, and having a perception of existing in the continuity of location. Designing for “place” he says, is absolutely key.

uoregon

Modular Making in the Age of Digital Craft | A Collaboration Between the University of Oregon and Oregon College of Art and Craft

Something remarkable is happening this fall 2011 term with University of Oregon School of Architecture and Allied Arts students in Portland and Oregon College of Art and Craft students in the UO Architecture 4/584 Architectural Design course.  Along with instructors, Nathan Clark Corser (AIA, LEED AP, Design Principal of IDC Architects), Karl Burkheimer (OCAC and head of that college’s Wood Department) and architects, Peter Anderson and Mark Anderson (Anderson & Anderson Architects, San Francisco, California) students participated in a completely hands-on building project from start to finish. This is a collaborative project….stay tuned.  We just want to give you a preview of what has been happening on-site.

Watch the University of Oregon:  School of Architecture and Allied Arts Facebook page for more photos and updates.  View the photographic progression of the project on the Facebook PhotoAlbum:  Modular Making in the Age of Digital Craft.

Read the blog by the students involved in the project at makemakemakemake.tumblr.com

Here is the general course description to give some background information:

What is the place of Arts and Crafts in the 21st century? How can a school for craft better serve its faculty, students, visitors and patrons while projecting its mission and purpose to them and the broader community? The Oregon College of Arts and Crafts (OCAC) has initiated a tutorial class to address these questions. Those OCAC student’s charge is to investigate an architectural design/build methodology, informing a design practice with a hands on approach to making. AAA students in this studio will work in an interdisciplinary manner with the OCAC instructor and students joining together to envision and design a campus augmented and enhanced through the planning for new entries, pathways, new structures and future expansion(s). Within the context of  an ambitious current master planning approach and recently completed signature buildings AAA and OCAC students will help define and refine the spatial quality, experience and character of this forested hillside campus. This investigation, design and building studio will be comprised of three primary components that we are inextricably linked together; 1) a site analysis and planning exercise looking to improve site entries, connectivity, place making and wayfinding; 2) a modular structures design and development component sufficient to demonstrate direct applicability to current and anticipated future programmatic needs at this site and, lastly; 3) full scale tectonic design and prototyping modeling and built assemblies sufficient to ascertain cost and substantiate constructability.

A model of the south-facing wall.
On site at the Oregon College of Art and Craft.

 

Post sabina samiee pdx communications

PUARL | Fall 2011 International Conference, Portland, Oregon

The 2011 PUARL Conference, staged for October 28-31, 2011 was located at the University of Oregon in Portland White Stag Building.   The focus of the event addressed “Generative Process, Patterns, and the Urban Challenge”.  PUARL’s series of conferences intended to contribute to the global development of new Pattern Language approaches.  Recently, I invited Professor Hajo Neis, Associate Professor, Director of PUARL and organizer of the conference to provide this blog post with his comments on the event.  His comments are provided below:

Following the successful First International PUARL Symposium in the Fall of 2009 with the authors of the seminal book “A Pattern Language” at the center of attention, the Second International PUARL Conference 2011, centered again around the overall pattern language approach, but also exploring the boundaries of the field with new concepts and expanding into other disciplines and fields of enquiry including an exciting array of national and international speakers and participants. The PUARL International Conference is conducted every two years at the University of Oregon Portland Urban Architecture Research Laboratory Whitestag Building in Downtown Portland. The main theme of this year’s October 2011 conference was entitled “Generative Process, Pattern Language, and the Urban Challenge.” Patterns and pattern languages are the most well-known elements of this school of thought and they form an essential method and central part of an ongoing investigation and practical application also at PUARL. They have been successfully applied in thousands of architecture and urban projects, including continuous application in the University of Oregon Planning Process in Eugene, and including design application for the White Stag buildings here in Portland. Patterns and pattern languages were originally developed by Chris Alexander, Sara Ishikawa, Murray Silverstein and others in Berkeley at the Center for Environmental Structure (CES), for the purpose of providing a sound understanding of environmental elements and their qualities in a systematic and methodical fashion. Originally developed in and for the field of architecture design, patterns are now not only researched and applied in the field of architecture and urbanism, but they also made a triumphal journey into as large number of academic disciplines and professional fields: In particular the method is widely applied in computer science, as for example the invention of the well-known ‘wiki’ well demonstrates (a wiki is based on the structure of a pattern). Patterns and pattern languages are ideal ways of solving problems not only in the field of architecture and urban design but in a large variety of disciplines, and they could be particularly useful in interdisciplinary research and application as a common method that connects different fields, trying for example to solve complex urban problems.Recent work in this area of investigation is focusing on what is called ‘generative process,’ generative design, and generative (urban) codes, where pattern languages form one kind of such a generative system or process. Consequently in our 2011 conference the emphasis was on the topic of generative process with an expanding participation and audience within architecture and architects but also connecting to a variety of other disciplines, such as social science, psychology, semiotics, language, art, music and computer science. Here, the presentations of parametric computer designs as part of generative design marked an important and worthwhile connection. Hence, the conference focused on advanced issues of Generative Process and Pattern Languages as well as current Urban Challenges that we are more and more faced with, such as large population increase with more urbanization and the growth of many more cities in the world with its ensuing problems. The question was asked, what is needed in the world, and what can patterns and pattern languages as well as generative processes and design contribute to solving some of the world’s new urban problems.  The three day conference was a definite success, with more than forty contributions by national and international scholars from the US and abroad. With around hundred participants, the conference was also well frequented and accepted by our students here in Portland at the University of Oregon. Starting with the PUARL keynote lecture by Professor Don Corner (The Roots of Deep Energy Retrofit), and continuing with a keynote contribution by Professor Wolfgang Stark from the University of Duisburg-Essen (Innovation & Improvisation Patterns for Organizations & Social Systems), a contribution by Professor Howard Davis (Resilient Urban Morphologies), as well as a lecture by Language Professor Jens Gurr (The ‘Cultural Dimension of Sustainability’ in Urban Systems), the conference was appropriately concluded with a keynote lecture by Professor Dieter Hassenpflug from the Bauhaus University in Weimar, Germany with the title: “Another Language of Patterns: Semiotics of Chinese Urban Space.”The next conference in two years is projected to possibly take place in the ‘Ruhr-Metropolis’ in Germany at the University of Duisburg-Essen. The theme of the conference is envisioned as ‘World Patterns and Urban Systems.’

“Generative Process, Patterns and the Urban Challenge,” sought to  investigate the nature of generative process, generative design, and the relationship to pattern languages as well as the day-to-day urban challenges facing a global and wholistic design perspective.  The fundamental purpose of PUARL is to conduct and promote activities in urban architecture research and urban design research:  the lab attempts to integrate wholeness and sustainability into the architectural and urban design process by conducting basic and applied research throughout the Portland region (and also other parts of the nation and the world) in urban morphology, urban building typologies, and urban processes for civic groups, public agencies, professional firms and development interests.  PUARL is a part of the Department of Architecture at the University of Oregon in both Eugene and Portland.  PUARL works to explore urban morphology and urban patterns, urban building typologies and patterns, and urban ecology and urban landscapes.

Please contact PUARL:  puarl.uoregon.edu

Related Websites:

Pattern Language

Living Neighborhoods
For more information and to inquire about availability of this year’s 2011 PUARL publication please contact:pdxarch@uoregon.edu503-412-3718
Hajo Neis |  (503) 412-3731  |   hajoneis@uoregon.edu  |  Associate Professor and Director  |   Portland Architecture Program  |  Website http://www.uoregon.edu/~hajoneis/

Howard Davis  |   (541) 346-3665   |  hdavis@uoregon.edu  |  Professor, Department of Architecture

Don Genasci  |  (503) 725-3732  |  dgenasci@uoregon.edu  |  Professor, Department of Architecture

Post and photos sabina samiee